Quote:
However in the past 3 days we have switch to pking/massacre as a new strat(as I said, lots of people, new things being tried) to take out their main attackers and causing them to reset.
Some people disagree with this method and say it's useless, to just take someone down to 200 acres, leave them, and they have crap gains(however they are still having good gains, of 30+ acres, per attack). At this point every attacker can pretty much break any other attack and make up to 3 attacks per time.
I'm not quite sure what you are getting at with this. Is this a variant of deep chain ghetto style, or a concerted attempt to set up a pk? Keeping an attacker to an arbitrary land size all war is useless, especially if that attacker has little or no defense left. Whether early war or late war, the purpose of a landchain is to remove resources, whether they are defense, thieves, peasants, or offense. If a landchain does not remove significant amounts of any of these, then it is doing nothing.