Printable View
Your not fooling me... You set up that last war to take warring crown. Snatch News says so much. 8 hits from Panda's in the last 24hrs of your war? There is nothing you can say to make me believe that a 2 win kingdom can only put out 8 hits in a 24hr period. I am anxiously waiting to see your war wins drop from 7 to 0. I hate cheaters.
relax. no one cares about WW that much.
Unless your not a super kingdom and have never won a crown, and now we may finish 2nd because of this.
Edit: 27 ages straight we have played together. Never once finishing top 10 on any charts... And when we have a chance to finish 1st and this happens... Kinda get a little pissed...
You should have warred a little more then, looks like you were outplayed....like abs for the land crown :pQuote:
Originally Posted by DeDLySMuRF
Edit..you are 7/10. My original statement above is incorrect....you should have "won more wars" is more appropriate
Not outplayed... Cheated... There is a difference.
Cheated how exactly?
You have logs confirming this?Quote:
Originally Posted by DeDLySMuRF
Hold on a second. Your kingdom wanted to land drop almost 20k acres and delete provinces to war mine. Do you really think attempting to drop 33% of your land, in the process massively buffing your wpa and bpa is any more fair of an attempt to win the war crown than what wolf pack did?
Ahhh so we learn more about DeDLySMuRF :) he using shady tactics tooQuote:
Originally Posted by Meep
problem here is shady tactics are allowed...if shunned...however fake war is not
last day of wolf packs war was 81 hits form wolf pack, and only 8 returned from their opponents
wolf pack also sent their dragon after their opponent surrendered and were toasted...
Total attacks made: 8 (1,549 acres)
-- Traditional march: 6 (1,207 acres)
-- Ambush: 2 (342 acres)
-- Uniques: 4
Total attacks suffered: 81 (7,476 acres)
-- Traditional march: 66 (6,891 acres)
-- Ambush: 4 (585 acres)
-- Plunder: 7
-- Learn: 2
-- Failed: 2 (2.5% failure)
-- Uniques: 30
It is EOA and some people go innactive, especially in the ghettos
i agree, i am only providing some facts to show people why the ops is claiming fake war, people asked for logs already and I'm sure he can only mean what the war appears to be. I agree its probably inactivity, but then their moanrch would have know his kingdom to bhe inactive, accepting the war anyway knowing it will hand a win and land etc over to another kingdom, could count as a fake war...well in my eyes, my kingdom doesn;t have the activity for a war right now so I won;t war.....and its got 16 times the activity or a kingdom that did for some reaosn happen to go to war with a kingdom in contention for WW crown that were likely much too much of a realistic challenge for them.
I agreew that the WW crown doesn;t mean much because apparently people only get them by bottom feeding a bunch of stupid kds it seems
TWP/WarAthon set up the war like they usually handle wars - by sending out invites to likely KD's. As far as I know there was no agreement for Panda's to readily handover the WW and WW Crown.
Opposing Queen asked her KD mates if they wanted to war - the answer was yes since it was EoA. Apparently the Panda's didn't have the activity to match their opponents and due to 1) Inactivity 2) One Panda sending 100k instead of 10k specs to the dragon and 3) One suicidal halfer, the first 12h already dictated the end of the war.
The last dragon was sent to ease up Panda's job of killing their dragon as the 2nd dragon was still roaming with more HP than a new dragon would have.
For sure TWP/WarAthon would not manage to beat any of the more serious KD's out there and as new formula for WW's will come into effect, they probably wont chart so high. But they have had between 7-10 wars per age for the last 2 years or so. So while they may not reach a high charting on WW chart, they will in all probability keep up the # of wars.
As steward of The Wolf Pack I can asure you that we dont arrange wars. We sent out invites, they reacted with a yes. We got to war and the Panda's weren't active sadly enough.
We would have loved to fight a more even war but we'll take the win. After being 3rd twice and in the top 10 for over 5 ages I believe, the coin fell to our favour this age. Well deserved crown for our team of players. :)
Some reactions in here are logical but some also offending. All wars we fought we were very active and we deserved the wins we got. One we were chewing on a 23prov KD while we only had 18-19 players at that time and we nearly won thatone too but decided to back out coz we wanted more wars and not fight for another 2 weeks and recover for one more.
Nothing unfair about it, in the end a little luck perhaps..... but that doesnt make us unfair.