Someone, you are right. I take back the location.
Printable View
Someone, you are right. I take back the location.
er... no he didnt....Quote:
Originally Posted by vines
Mike, tbh, i think its unethical to post locations officially.
Anyway, it seems like the wiki were outdated.
Close thread please? Im sleepy.
Greenie he was agreeing with me. So what does this mean can someone have -41.25% attack time if they ran 50% barracks?
By instinct i say no. But let me do it the catty-way:
1.5 * 50% rax * 100% BE * (1-50% rax)=1,5*0,5*1*(1-0,5)=0,375=37,5%
So no. Noone, but you, were incorrect at this point.
No, I explained why you misinterpreted the information on the site.
Quote:
Homes (birth rates) . multiplier 3 max 75%
I used that formula off that web page you gave me. And it keeps giving me 49.99. The building calculator says the max is 43.13%. Something is off it has to be 49.99 or 43.13% one of the two. Catwalk I don't understand what you are saying is it or is it not +75% to birth rate. I'm not kidding in my survey page it says +75% to birth rate.
What formula are you trying to apply on what and how?
I'm plugging 50% barracks into the building calculator on Angel now, and I'm getting -37.5% attack time. The formula gives me -37.5% as well. It's not your lucky day vines.
Attack time reduced by = 1.5 * (Barracks / Land) * BuildingEffectiveness * (1 - (Barracks / Land))
1.5(268/535)*100*(1 - (268/535))
When I do that I need up with 49.99
Are you using 1.92? How can we both be getting different number?
All fine so farQuote:
Quote:
Attack time reduced by = 1.5 * (Barracks / Land) * BuildingEffectiveness * (1 - (Barracks / Land))
1.5(268/535)*100*(1 - (268/535))
Not so fineQuote:
When I do that I need up with 49.99
http://www.google.se/search?hl=sv&q=...%B6kning&meta=
Dont know if it works whereever you are. But you have to do something wrong.
Someone, we forgot to use vines-math, where 1/92 = 92% = 0.092. That would make quite a difference.
Aaaah. You are so correct my dear catwalk :) (if anyone get the fun in that, ill be very impressed, and very happy)
vines, insert 0.5 instead of (268/535). And no arguing about how you wish to calc it, the one who created that formula certainly didnt do it your way. So you better do it our way, or create your own formulas.
I'll have a go at it:
1/50 = 50% = 0.05
I'm sure we can use those numbers somehow to get whatever result we want.