Simians Vs Sanc, HoH or Rage

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sexual harassment panda

lol im laughing my ass off reading this stuff.

now sinners is involved for no apparent reason but because anri is, well, anri?????

If I didn't know any better I'd assume this is just for simian's chance to crown the longest thread which is currently being held by bio killing kittens. We had a nice head start, but I see massive potential in this. All we need is the plot to thicken further by having a horde of absholes come here and justify shake and bake-ing rage to a dice victory again. "If ya aint first ur last!" -"that's stupid, you can be second, third, fourth... hell you can even be fifth" Does sanc and hoh get partial crown credit for helping them so much?????? Is taht how it works?

---

Quote:

---

Rage and Simians sorted some diplomacy out. All is fine now and Rage get to do what Rage wants to do. Best of luck to them til we meet again if we meet again.

---

Quote:

---

In the end i think we got what we wanted from it. So best of luck to Rage.

---

does Anri get partial crown credit for cf-ing rage and letting them dice away ???

Good ol' Anri.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sexual harassment panda

lol im laughing my ass off reading this stuff.

now sinners is involved for no apparent reason but because anri is, well, anri?????

If I didn't know any better I'd assume this is just for simian's chance to crown the longest thread which is currently being held by bio killing kittens. We had a nice head start, but I see massive potential in this. All we need is the plot to thicken further by having a horde of absholes come here and justify shake and bake-ing rage to a dice victory again. "If ya aint first ur last!" -"that's stupid, you can be second, third, fourth... hell you can even be fifth" Does sanc and hoh get partial crown credit for helping them so much?????? Is taht how it works?

---

Hate to remind you but Rage was #1 with a 7k lead before these notices were even served. Why are you dragging us into this. You should remember that, it was the free hits we got from your kingdom that helped get us there. Simply decided we didn't want to wait trained up while Simians fights other kingdoms when we can be doing other stuff. I guess according to you we should sit there for 12 days while simians fights back to back kingdoms and takes full EOW cf, no thank you.

Good luck to all parties involved, let's keep our name out of this discussion.

Hmm , i left 1/2 hr before the hostilities were able to start, just got back. I dunno just getting caught up to speed but Simians hasnt even intelled my prov yet so not entirely sure whats up with that.

I just want to point out. The topic of this thread is "Simians Vs Sanc, HoH or Rage" made by arni himself. Observe the part "Simians", and than the "vs" follow by "Sanc" =) ... the rest are merely odd adjective added to a non-functional odd plot. The level of oddness is unoddbtainable!

Here's the problem with Simians way of thinking: (Since my other post apparently didn't even post)

When you look at it, and really analyze it, it's a joke in how highly abusable it is. Say you know a superior kingdom is about to wave you. Solution? Hit a kingdom with no intention to fight you whatsoever and cry "hostile" in order to avoid them. If this strategy was sound and approved, any kingdom on the verge of being waved like Simians was could hit another kingdom and cry hostile.

Basically, its a coward's way of abusing the "system". What stops anyone from doing this repeatedly just to get out of being waved if such behavior is tolerated?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jdorje

Sinners aren't assholes, they are just morons.

When you give notice to 3 kingdoms at once, you don't get to pick who you fight. Anri agreed with this earlier, and said he would fight who we picked.

We picked sanctuary. We told him this, and sent a dragon, and made a hit, right after the ceasefire expired. We told him we would wave as soon as they left fortified.

Sinnners however realized that our cow could hit his all home and stay unbreakable (a neat trick btw), so Anri wanted a fakewar. So they swapped to aggressive and made 8 hits within a few seconds before we could do anything.

So now, we are waving them, as we said we would. I don't know what hoh intends to do, though I have encouraged them to offer a ceasefire.

To say that we are to blame for this is just dumb. Your ceasefire with us expired and we waved you. We told you we were going to wave you. You don't get to beat us to the punch and wave someone else and claim a hostile and get out of it. If someone else had waved you, we woudl stay out, but that didn't happen. I expected a good war with simians, but all you wanted was to dodge us after noticing us. GG.

---

Didn't you b*tches whine at us when we hit you after you noticed us during hostile with Pulse? When a few days nothing happened and we took the first step? I'll encourage anyone who is ever in the same position to just keep hitting you, because you're full of sh*t.

You noobs from Absalom always whine how everyone plays dirty against Absalom, but you always neglect how you pull the exact same sh*t. ****ing hypocrites.
You had enough time to land more hits and actually claim hostile. You didn't because you where too afraid to full wave into fortified. Had you done, you had every right to claim hostile. Looking at the paper though, you waved into an active hostile.

The single hit nor the dragon are considered active hostile.


Lets see what speech I'll get for this ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ducktales

Here's the problem with Simians way of thinking: (Since my other post apparently didn't even post)

When you look at it, and really analyze it, it's a joke in how highly abusable it is. Say you know a superior kingdom is about to wave you. Solution? Hit a kingdom with no intention to fight you whatsoever and cry "hostile" in order to avoid them. If this strategy was sound and approved, any kingdom on the verge of being waved like Simians was could hit another kingdom and cry hostile.

Basically, its a coward's way of abusing the "system". What stops anyone from doing this repeatedly just to get out of being waved if such behavior is tolerated?

---

Hey sherlock, you pulled the same **** in the trio Pulse/Sanc/Inso when Sanc first notices Pulse, then does a ****ty staring contest, notices Inso, and then hits Pulse when Inso's notice expired and you're too chicken**** to fight us ;p
Dont point fingers at others for crimes you committed yourself.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by prot

Didn't you b*tches whine at us when we hit you after you noticed us during hostile with Pulse? When a few days nothing happened and we took the first step? I'll encourage anyone who is ever in the same position to just keep hitting you, because you're full of sh*t.

You noobs from Absalom always whine how everyone plays dirty against Absalom, but you always neglect how you pull the exact same sh*t. ****ing hypocrites.
You had enough time to land more hits and actually claim hostile. You didn't because you where too afraid to full wave into fortified. Had you done, you had every right to claim hostile. Looking at the paper though, you waved into an active hostile.

The single hit nor the dragon are considered active hostile.


Lets see what speech I'll get for this ;)

---

No one is mature enough to have a rock thrown at them and not throw a rock back in an online game. Definitely not myself either.

For example, you breaking alliance/nap with me on BF. Later that age I broke alliance/nap with Allanon. It's just how the cookie crumbles in an online game that regulates itself.

So it really amazes me why everyone is so shocked when this stuff happens. Were you asleep for the past 100 combined ages?

can someone please clear up the term dibbs to me??? i dont remember ever hearing it in game. in fact the last time i heard it was probably kindergarden. what is this dibbs? how did it come to be truer than a hostile in which there were notices served??? what supercedes what dibbs or hostile??? is double dibbing into a shared land bowl frowned upon??

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lykron

you are the one who is trying to twist facts by saying dragon sending isn't a hostile act.

---

It's not. Abs has confirmed this on the forums more than once. Stfu if you dont know what you're talking about

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Darkz Azn

When you have enough crowns, every ages is the same thing. Nothing like having fun and filter the bull. Play the game. if you win; you win. If not better luck next time. =)

Play with common sense.


Overall:



ODD

---

Must be a proteus quote. Sanc hardly has any crowns so dunno what dark_azn is talking bout.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by I_am_Spartacus

No one is mature enough to have a rock thrown at them and not throw a rock back in an online game. Definitely not myself either.

For example, you breaking alliance/nap with me on BF. Later that age I broke alliance/nap with Allanon. It's just how the cookie crumbles in an online game that regulates itself.

So it really amazes me why everyone is so shocked when this stuff happens. Were you asleep for the past 100 combined ages?

---

How does BF relate to this? Besides, that was because you didn't help the alliance, you just leeched from 2 sides. Not much of an accomplishment ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by prot

It's not. Abs has confirmed this on the forums more than once. Stfu if you dont know what you're talking about

---

Then why was Simians crying they were being gangbanged based on JUST the INITIATION of dragons? Both sides pull facts/actions in their own favor and the side with the most land bullies in-game. Welcome to Utopia.

Lews is odd.