#officialtrashtalkthread

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kern

It may go against the spirit of the agreement, but definitely doesn't go against the wording (especially since it looks like they got relations when neither monarch nor steward were online. I guess it depends on how literally you're taking the agreement?

---

Thank you for your opinion :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MyNameIsMatija

#1 did happen :P

---

Really? That's even better lol

Palem, you are my muse.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Godly

Lots of people in this thread that don't know what the **** they're talking about. 2 rounds ago I spent 4 hours trying to negotiate a CF with Mithras (Emeriti) to include Pyro (flogger) in the CR/Emeriti CF deal as a favor to flogger. I tried my best, they refused to CF flogger. What does flogger do? He waves us with avians (a race that cannot lose land in war) and essentially gives Emeriti additional time to be ready for us. This is the kind of mentality I'm talking about. Every time flogger joins Pyro, he basically just comes up with greedy all-in setups that will get ****ed over 9/10 times to try to get a war win off us before he quits the round. He can't do it in BB because they know better. His all-in this round was basically "I'm gonna dump my pool in protection and train 0 offense. If anyone with a brain is in a nearby island, I'll just quit." He's basically the personification of playing an offline poker game on your computer. You just go all in over and over again until you bust and then create a new game.

I'm still not certain why no kingdom waved them or emeriti after they did CBs and saw 0 offense. It's like kingdoms are either brain dead or purposely playing against their win condition of getting a free wave + CF. Solution: lift the island reveal so all kingdoms have the opportunity to punish and it isn't just "who is lucky enough to be rolled on an island."

---

You realize that we waved out OOP and explored 12 dudes with no offense. Emeriti waved out with 3 dudes and explored 22 with no offense, right? When you assume your 2 biggest threats do the same thing and you do something else and it loses, maybe your strategy wasn't ideal.

flogger, Goldy said what wins. Now get with the program. Stop being obnoxious. Now I just have to figure out what to do with these pesky bonuses we won... because we did not win, because Goldy said so.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sheister

Palem, you are my muse.

---

...thank you?
...you're welcome?

I'm not sure which one is appropriate for that lol

Both at the same time at full blast.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sheister

flogger, Goldy said what wins. Now get with the program. Stop being obnoxious. Now I just have to figure out what to do with these pesky bonuses we won... because we did not win, because Goldy said so.

---

I love you, ****ster!

http://rs402.pbsrc.com/albums/pp105/...r19xo.gif~c200

Anyone else think this resembles a team picking up a win against the 90s bulls and then going on a long rant about how they're garbage?

Fairly classless.

Point to a war in which I bragged after winning. I didn't do it after we beat this same pyro 2 rounds ago or when flogger donated land to us last round to avoid getting beaten again. This is the difference between champions and pretenders.

Good job on the war win. You still have 3 months left to play in the round and about 3 years of crowning to catch up to us.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Palem

Chill


also, lol

---

Me chill? You've let a flamebait thread go on for 10 pages and your only action other than inciting the flamebaiting is to tell me to chill? **** off.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Godly

Me chill? You've let a flamebait thread go on for 10 pages and your only action other than inciting the flamebaiting is to tell me to chill? **** off.

---

This is precious, it's other's fault that you are flaming.

Let me introduce you to a definition of flamebait:

flamebait
An email, usually to a message board, written with intent to offend\anger\enrage other persons, so that they will send a flaming email in reply.


In the simplest terms of this thread:
flogger: you suck
godly: you're an ass
Palem: godly you're out of line


Threads like these should be locked instantly or the moderation shouldn't take sides. If flogger wants to apologize for his general disrespect shown towards me and CR then he can feel free to do so. I still won't ever talk to him again but at least the other 24 people in CR might accept it.

I don't remember flogger flaming you, his wording was limited to stuff like "yep" iirc.

Obviously the intended effect was achieved though, you make it too easy. He pushed all the right buttons in all the right places it seems.

I make it easy? The majority of this forum is just keyboard warriors trying to trigger me. If we were to meet in person you wouldn't say **** to me. Why would I act any different on the internet? On the internet you can talk **** to whoever you want and try to get a rise out of them. That's called flamebaiting. I don't play around like that.