ED Vs PewPew

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Relic

oh dont be a hypocrit, you fought back pretty half heartedly against AMA in that hostile, they are your allies after all, suprisingly many armies home, yet here you are judging the intensity of two other kingdoms war.

So was it that or was it the deal breaking you did later that took your friendship with elit to the next level?

---

Last age Hostile with Jerks was real, we had no deal. Pendel was mad on me for it, but i told him few weeks early if his kd grow and other kd try to farm them we will hit them too for sure.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Elit

Keep us updated and feel free to share more strategic tactics you use this war ;)

---

Seems like you do need the help :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrCurious

I dont know you, and considering you talk as if you have the facts, i will assume you play in one of the top kds. If you dont, well.. you get the picture. The war between ama and pew was legit, you could tell by the hardcore chaining that went on from the 1st second. Compare that war to this one, and you will see some very odd patterns. If you cant see them then i dont know what else to tell you.

---

And those 'odd patterns' would not have anything to do with the choice of who they are choosing to chain?

Those 'odd patterns' would not have anything to do with who had the button at start of war?

It's funny how people from kds that constantly fail their conflicts against us keep giving strategy advices to Elit :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Elit

Last age Hostile with Jerks was real, we had no deal. Pendel was mad on me for it, but i told him few weeks early if his kd grow and other kd try to farm them we will hit them too for sure.

---

Why is the word of a known dealbreaker good?, i cant remember.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Relic

Why is the word of a known dealbreaker good?, i cant remember.

---

So you're saying your word is no good? Ok, noted.

I find it funny that AMA/Jerks people naturally assume its a fake war because a) Both kds agreed to war and b) chains look different then a previous war.

A) Agreeing to war is done all the time, its fully legit and the only ones *****ing about it are those that cant get wars themselves or wanna war the two parties that agreed on the war.

B) Binar and even Parth both stated several times that PewPew messed up and did half a wave from fortified. Stuff like that happen. On top of that both PewPew and ED went for chaining t/ms + a few smaller provs which guraenteed was left over offense from hitting the t/ms. If u have followed any of their wars before (not only this age but previous ages) you know that both of them, just like alot of other capable war kds, aim to take down t/ms first as they else soon become UB when ur top offenses are chained down and ur offenses in general wear down. If u look at the summary and kd page u can quite quickly see that PewPew went for harder chains (halfers) combined with some easy low def avians while ED went for an elf and some easier avians. But because they only chained easy avians hard in their previous war and chained better, that mean this is a fake war? Seriously?

Guess we know compare strategies from war to war to determine if its a fake war or real war. Or if one kd have a ****ty wave, then it can also be a fake war.

My god am I the only one that think this is starting to get waaaay to ridiculous (woaa did I spell that word right?) ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Elit

Keep us updated and feel free to share more strategic tactics you use this war ;)

---

Do the least damage as possible, hit once a week, keep 100% mana and stealth. Dunno if i missed anything else.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shai

I find it funny that AMA/Jerks people naturally assume its a fake war because a) Both kds agreed to war and b) chains look different then a previous war.

A) Agreeing to war is done all the time, its fully legit and the only ones *****ing about it are those that cant get wars themselves or wanna war the two parties that agreed on the war.

B) Binar and even Parth both stated several times that PewPew messed up and did half a wave from fortified. Stuff like that happen. On top of that both PewPew and ED went for chaining t/ms + a few smaller provs which guraenteed was left over offense from hitting the t/ms. If u have followed any of their wars before (not only this age but previous ages) you know that both of them, just like alot of other capable war kds, aim to take down t/ms first as they else soon become UB when ur top offenses are chained down and ur offenses in general wear down. If u look at the summary and kd page u can quite quickly see that PewPew went for harder chains (halfers) combined with some easy low def avians while ED went for an elf and some easier avians. But because they only chained easy avians hard in their previous war and chained better, that mean this is a fake war? Seriously?

Guess we know compare strategies from war to war to determine if its a fake war or real war. Or if one kd have a ****ty wave, then it can also be a fake war.

My god am I the only one that think this is starting to get waaaay to ridiculous (woaa did I spell that word right?) ?

---

What do you base this on? You seem 100% sure this is real war - and to that i can only say, i hope you are right. Time will tell.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LightNing

im guessing we did it coz we can now wave jerks if and when we decide to and vice versa

....and anyone reading more into it than that is just making **** up.

anyone know what ezzer is smoking?

---

I must find out.

Why is this 11 pages of empty space? i see nothing

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AnonymousTroll

Yeah ama was at a huge disadvantage with 5 unbreakables vs 2. Kudos to eds cows who managed to fight a 2v5 and win pretty much...

It's quite obvious this isn't a fakewar. No matter how delusional you are. Close to max uniques by both kds and big hits on T/Ms & large attackers from both sides.
A couple of deep chains as well.

*
I find an arranged real war way better than the other stuff that's been going on this age.

-pewpew donating like 15-20k bank acres to ama over a 7day period. Setting them up for the nw crown like nothing else.
-Jerks serving notice to an offline monarch and refusing to extend the deadline. Giving ED 18 hours to draft and convert.

---

Monarch was online and we got him into our news, and the notice deal was 48hrs they came to cry 7 hrs after we served the notice so.... you lie.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by crease

I must find out.

Why is this 11 pages of empty space? i see nothing

---

you might want to get ur eyes checked :)

Elit did not CF ED after they had legit war. I am tired all this cheating! SICK AND TIRED!


@Ning+Crease: I had a drumstick and my brain stopped ticking.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parth

You do what you got to do flogger. Theres not much to this propaganda tho: We noticed them and went to war, I dunno, 20 minutes later?
Im guessing:
* They did not train up
* They did not change build

This was never our intention, and I very much doubt it happened. If you want clearity in what you accuse us of, lets ask jerks maybe?

---

When you serve someone you show intention to war, only my fair play stop me from hitting into you war, I guess you are brain damaged but why the hell you piss off AMA, then you come and piss off us and run into fake war.... You are doing some mastermind leadership there.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pendel1

Monarch was online and we got him into our news, and the notice deal was 48hrs they came to cry 7 hrs after we served the notice so.... you lie.

---

Of course he is lying he also said ed "beat" AMA wen they clearly lost after their horrible vulture attempt failed, begged for cf and then resorted to arranging war when they failed. I don't know who is more ghetto part or pewpew but both have no significant accomplishments ingame other than losing to well known kingdoms.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Proteus

I don't know who is more ghetto part or pewpew but both have no significant accomplishments ingame other than losing to well known kingdoms.

---

The sad truth behind this statement is that both accomplished more on their own that Proteus ever will. I refer to my previous statement on page 7 :p