I'm more than happy with our performance this age.
I'll never not **** over people who dealbreak me.
Printable View
Palem is correct pretty hilarious that Ovenmitt thought that. I mean consider the insults he hurls.
Ah, I also did not realize "staying in war but not fighting so that your enemy can take your acres because you don't care anymore" was approved behavior.Quote:
Being under GB/Get hits OOW sure cant motivate any kingdom to give his best for "keep his acres" so "lame" people oow can take them. Its really not hard to understand it.
Its why GB is never good and its every time result chart shape. Here is no difference if acres going to X or Y side. General result is same.
And you are explaining a kingdom's decision to remain in that war for 96 hours past the minimum time by saying that it would rather give its farmers easy acres for days on end rather than take the uncertain risk that some other kingdoms might take a fraction of those same acres.
Pretty sure "staying in war without fighting so the other side can get even more gainzzzz" is one of them there not okay.
Did Spartans start intra razing/dropping acres yet?
it wasn't if...BB, div and a few others did GB CR. Maybe that explains it better. Did they stay in the war longer than they needed to be? probably, but there are lots of kingdoms that do that on occasion , mine included. One thing for certain if someone hits into my hostile or war I wouldn't hesitate to ruin their age if I found a way. I would definitely not withdraw just to do them a favor either.
Did they stay in the war longer than they needed to be?
If they were GBd and forced into an impossible war, why would they stay a moment past min time? The only permissible reason to remain in a war is precisely "to war." Staying in for any other reason, especially one that allows the other side to farm tens of thousands of acres with no resistance, is not proper.
I thought it looked 50-50