Printable View
You're implying that people who ****play and win deserve to win, no? Because only winners deserve to winQuote:
Originally Posted by Palem
On an unrelated note, why chase the crown so hard anyway? What's so special about it? When's the last time it signified anything, and why should people give away their sense of decency for it?
dafuq? good troll.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightmare_
Read carefully. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Realest
winning's winning. the game quantifies in an indisputable manner.
I'm implying winners win. There's no "deserving" about it.
If you can surround yourself with enough people that think the way you think so you don't have to do things you don't agree with, great. Win that way.
If you can't then you either need to things their way, or don't complain when you lose because of them.
Okay, makes more sense to me now. AgreeQuote:
Originally Posted by Palem
See, now THAT was a good troll.Quote:
Originally Posted by Realest
So because your war vs Pyro seemed less of a for sure win for you and more like an even war, your response is to dealbreak? Like are you listening to yourself? Snap out of it. We didn't do *anything* wrong much less anything to dealbreak. It sucks what happened to you 4 rounds ago but seriously you need to stop using that as a crutch for everything and try to compete within the terms of your deals. If you lose, you lose. At least you don't sink yourself to this level. When I was in Beastblood with flogger we had to fight all Abs kingdoms back to back to back to win it. We didn't cry, complain, or dealbreak.. we just did it and won. At the end of the day, that was the most satisfying crown that I've ever won. For that one crown win, there were 50 others that I fought in a very unfair scenario and got my ass kicked. But you know what? I never stooped to this level because it's just a game and there's always next round.Quote:
Originally Posted by Elit
You refuse extend cf us and let us war with pyro for free. After it you made this topic and call dibs us and made it clear if we war pyro you will wave us still. Dont see how its not wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Godly
And then when we gave you what you wanted, that still wasn't enough? OHhh I get it. Because there was a thread and a couple of people hurt your feelings, it's ok to dealbreak. Got it. Thanks for clarifying that this is how utopia is meant to be played. I'm sure in future rounds this type of behavior will be unacceptable again right?
So AMA/PB couldn't war Pyro because then even if they won Havoc/CR would beat them and win the age anyway. So with that what Elit is actually saying here is that they choose to dealbreak to win the age? Surely they can't be so naive to think that there won't be repercussions to this kind of action? Elit who has time and time again adviced people to think twice about doing shady **** as there will be repercussions in coming ages has revealed what a complete hypocrit he is. To the people that didn't already know it, that is.
When you corner a Turkey => you will be eating turkey dinner.
When you corner a Pitbull => prepare to get your arm ripped off.
Can't say I'm ever in favour of a deal break but I have a bigger issue with CR. The starting of a useless thread to poke a Pitbull insinuating a claim to a target you have a CF with at said time thread was made (whether it was in good nature or malice is of no consequence)
Obviously CR had ample resources to prepare before the cf arrangement was up. #1 they were arrogant to not be prepared when AMA's net started to increase, #2 was the 3-4 extra days of science/wpa pump worth it, obviously not.
In the ghetto these things happen quite frequently and maybe that's the difference between a ghetto and a "top" kingdom . I can garuntee you the ghetto wouldn't have underestimated their opponent and not prepared regardless of a CF or not. So my question is since the ghetto kingdom would have been prepared what does that make CR exactly?
I think Anarchy is the best policy and would love too see all of these crappy CF's go out the window.
NOT.Quote:
Originally Posted by Minty
We had perfect peaceful age with zauper in charge on Havoc. He promised us CF extend and we was preparing for war Pyro and after it kd win war was going to war Havoc. We got under impression we have deal for few days and after it accident Zauper told his kd refuse to CF us for free and next day they made this topic in forum. If you play in havoc this can look ok for you but not for us. They posted clear they will wave us dont matter what. This was total BS move.
I'm not in Havoc and that's irrelevant. What you say has been said so many times but Havoc appearently gave you that chance, to war 1v1 without interuption with an extension of 96 hours after end of war cf. It's already been explained why you chose not to take it and it makes you a massive hypocrit, but please, explain again why did you not engage in your "oh so awaited" 1v1 vs pyro?Quote:
Originally Posted by Elit
No we weren't, but thank you for asking. Shouldn't you be focusing more on finding a new kd (yet again) ?Quote:
Originally Posted by American Badass
No I am fine I have everything sorted. Thanks for your concern.
BTW as a male you go on paternity leave, not maternity leave unless you are a female with a "mr" name but then that is just weird.
Ty for clarifying. English is not my first language. I am sure you are not lame enough to hassle ppl about their language skills. Gl in your new kd, fingers crossed you manage to stay put this time.Quote:
Originally Posted by American Badass
No worries bud.
RIP Utopia
sweet
when havoc and sanc 2vs1 ama its not "rip utopia"
when havoc/cr make dibs and promise to hit even in war its not "rip utopia"
but when ama tax havoc/cr for ****talking/****doing its "omg utopia is so going to die :)
nothing wrong happened, sound suckerpunch at the bare Godly's neck, utopia will somehow survive :)
I never understood any of the rip utopia comments. They have been made before in other treads too. Would anyone using them care to explain why several thousand players should suddenly stop playing cause one kingdom has a smaller chance of winning?
Havoc calls AMA via thread. Thats a notice if u ask me. Few days later ama waves - after notice comes a wave. I see nothing wrong here.
And to be honest what do you expect?! Do you think the proud polar bears will just do nothing when u threaten with 2v1, oow hits ect ect?! If u poke the bear ... well u know the rest.
If you are afraid of bears dont corner and piss off the biggest bear in the forest cuz you gonna get rly hurt :)
Peace \/
After following the game of thrones series I had a deeper appreciation for ****play. Their ****play just make their stuff so fun to watch, plust their nudies.
I think the reason AMA did this is because Pyro was outwhoring them and was going to beat them in a war anyway because they'd win the 5v3 cow fight.
Inevitably they are going to raze the acres gained off of everything except their cows and somehow try to claim that their 19k cows instead of 13-15k cows doesn't play a big part in them beating pyro.
So when faced with two kingdoms they couldn't beat, they decided to ****play and dealbreak instead.
Really? Because polar bears live in the forest. Stop with RL comparisons. You see nothing wrong with what you just did? That's just insane. Give me some of what your smoking.Quote:
Originally Posted by guard14n
Ever seen the show Lost?Quote:
Originally Posted by Abscond
_./ Take a seat.
Problem with community is level of hypocrisy at play and caring about affairs selectively.
1. Did anyone care when simians farmed out to hoh deliberately to shape charts? No.
2. Did anyone care when Bio 2v1ed Rage on several occasions? No
3. Did anyone care when Strippers dealbroke Rage unprovoked whatsoever? No.
4. Did anyone care when Havoc and Sanc 2v1ed AMA to ****play them out of a crown? No.
5. Did anyone care when Swea,Simians, pewpew, etc. gbed AMA eoa? No.
6. Did anyone care when pewpew deliberately farmed out to swea to decide crown outcome? No
Countless times serious **** play happened and no one cared about it. People only seem to care when it suits them or affect their personal outcome. What is this, fly by night morals?
again i think you are looking in the mirror but you don't seem to recognize yourself?Quote:
Originally Posted by Godly
lets go though it step by step so you can see yourself more clearly
1)you made it clear you were not going to allow ama to war pyro 1 on 1 with out interference from CR.
2)you have done many wrong things to many Utopians all age deal breaks and lies
3)you and maxi have brought CR to an all time low and destroyed zaupers reputation for fair ethical play
4)you and maxi are the ones who have been afraid to war all age
5)reverse tax on CR is a beautiful thing or get off your knees and war 1 on 1
Hi Proteus.Quote:
Originally Posted by Proteus
Did you intervene when Disturbed hit into HRS' hostile?
Did you help Mercy when people were hitting into their hostile with TFC?
Did you help when BoB hit into TFC's war?
IIRC, you SUPPORTED the 2v1 against AMA with ASF by your side justifying Sanctuary and Havoc.
You're sitting on a high horse, and his name is hypocrisy. If intervening doesn't help you directly you could care less who ****plays who. In fact, if it's your friends doing the ****playing, you'll defend them.
There is no hypocrisy in the community. Community is very stable. We enjoy drama and don't interfiere :)
If any gb is about to happen (which i doubt) it should happen the next hours, otherwise ama will secure the acres.
Why would don proteus intervene in ghettowars?Quote:
Originally Posted by Palem
Oh, hello potato couch. How many series have you watched so far?Quote:
Originally Posted by Band of Horses
1. You dealbroke because you are going to get farmed. You ****play because your KD was in bad position which you yourselves put into because of bad overall diplo. Stop trying to twist facts.Quote:
Originally Posted by Crunch
Willing to bet I am far more active than you :D I just only require 2 hours of sleep a night the rest is just spent resting my body and whilst doing that I watch TV.Quote:
Originally Posted by Abscond
Polar Bears in the forest, still stands and your slight on the poor guy that attempted an entry level metaphor should be retracted.
Srsly where is John this age and what is his stance on all this? He sure had a lot to say about chart integrity last age...
Also a quote from Departed that seems appropriate:
No one gives it to you.
You have to take it.
+1Quote:
Originally Posted by Meep
#justsaying
anyway, i would say remote's decision to raze ama prolly made this 'dealbreaking' option more viable.
He's not sitting on Hypocrisy at the moment, I believe Zod is taking her out for a ride. Proteus lets us each have turns at riding Hypocrisy. She's a very gentle Russian Don :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Palem
JSS's province is being sat right now. He had internet issues, phone Utopia sucks.
I will sit his forum account.Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy Pete
http://img.pandawhale.com/93182-boy-...rs-go-eyb0.gif
Well AMA ****play is based on #4. And you actually only base it on #4 since it suit you or affect your personal outcome. weird.Quote:
Originally Posted by Proteus
Btw what is AMA stance on the crowning/not the age? Seems like a lot of confusion in AMA on that subject. Funny coming from such a top kd that no conclusion was made before those huge actions.