omg omg omg panda what?!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by makeo

You're welcome.

Unlike you I've done this stuff before and realise just how much of a fronting idiot you are.

You'll lose people. Your behaviour was scum.

You are delusional

People would happily gb you.

No smilie. You are less than dog trash

---

Does your opinion change anything? No.
Stop offending me over an Internet game. It's getting personal.
All I can say is you don't know sh*t about me or my core so stop judging upon your own example. I am not you and we are not your kingdom.
Cheers!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by makeo

Ad you are a largely poor warring tier ghetto that deserves it and doesn't understand why their ethics are so bad.

---

Yes, we agree we are a very poor, overgrown warring tier ghetto.

Anyways. I'll catch your reply sometime later. As I have no interest in reading passive aggressive horse**** from a ghetto.

You're scum. No one respects your play. Your own kd hate it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by makeo

Anyways. I'll catch your reply sometime later. As I have no interest in reading passive aggressive horse**** from a ghetto.

You're scum. No one respects your play. Your own kd hate it.

---

Lol passive aggressive. You deliver, man you really do. Keep up the good work. :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pierniczek

Does your opinion change anything? No.
Stop offending me over an Internet game. It's getting personal.
All I can say is you don't know sh*t about me or my core so stop judging upon your own example. I am not you and we are not your kingdom.
Cheers!

---

Hopefully it may smarten you up

Other than that. Doubt it.

And ..I won't apologise for personal insults. I view your behaviour as pathetic.

I respect you as a fellow human. Your behaviour is disgusting.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pierniczek

Lol passive aggressive. You deliver, man you really do. Keep up the good work. :D

---

I'm quite direct.

You're scum.
You play dishonest.
You will lose players.
You are not intelligent.
Your attempts to diplo are funny as everyone sees you for what you are.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by makeo

I'm quite direct.

You're scum.
You play dishonest.
You will lose players.
You are not intelligent.
Your attempts to diplo are funny as everyone sees you for what you are.

---

sn0re, I thought you said you're going.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCQ0vDAbF7s

So far it looks like just CR stands for fair play. I wonder what's holding other top kingdoms back from also standing for fair play.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by home.alone

Last age you decided to make a statement cos technically you had lost the age.
This age CR makes a statement cos they have just like a very very far fetched chance to win this age. I will say technically CR has lost the age.

A kingdom never supports deal break when they are in top. They decide to make a statement only when they know they cannot be in the top!

---

To be fair, at the moment we hold a 10-15% lead over #2 honor, and sit at #3 in the WW chart. When we offered, it was more like a 20% lead over #2 honor and #1 WW as well. Us winning either or both of those charts is entirely in the realm of possibility ;p.

I spent a long time talking to JanK yesterday to see if there was a way to resolve this. JanK was volunteered to offer a lot of concessions -- acknowledging that what they did was wrong, an undefined number of acres (as much as notpandas wants, taken from their competitors and given to them), blocking notpandas competitors (esp emeriti, with whom they have no deal). When asked about how he has the war end, though -- the answer was drag it out until there's a clear winner (in their eyes).

I also would think that most people would be unhappy with a deal that results in them going and blocking for pandas.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zauper

To be fair, at the moment we hold a 10-15% lead over #2 honor, and sit at #3 in the WW chart. When we offered, it was more like a 20% lead over #2 honor and #1 WW as well. Us winning either or both of those charts is entirely in the realm of possibility ;p.

I spent a long time talking to JanK yesterday to see if there was a way to resolve this. JanK was volunteered to offer a lot of concessions -- acknowledging that what they did was wrong, an undefined number of acres (as much as notpandas wants, taken from their competitors and given to them), blocking notpandas competitors (esp emeriti, with whom they have no deal). When asked about how he has the war end, though -- the answer was drag it out until there's a clear winner (in their eyes).

I also would think that most people would be unhappy with a deal that results in them going and blocking for pandas.

---

what wait who suggested blocking as terms?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zauper

.

I spent a long time talking to JanK yesterday to see if there was a way to resolve this. JanK was volunteered to offer a lot of concessions -- acknowledging that what they did was wrong, an undefined number of acres (as much as notpandas wants, taken from their competitors and given to them), blocking notpandas competitors (esp emeriti, with whom they have no deal). When asked about how he has the war end, though -- the answer was drag it out until there's a clear winner (in their eyes).

I also would think that most people would be unhappy with a deal that results in them going and blocking for pandas.

---

By blocking I meant warring, real warring not min time acre farmout.

Our main goal of the age was to war the top top and that means everybody (Emeriti, Sparta, WSK, BB, CR, Pandas)
That is the only reason we ever grew in size right at the start of the age.

I can sign under the rest.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pierniczek

By blocking I meant warring, real warring not min time acre farmout.

Our main goal of the age was to war the top top and that means everybody (Emeriti, Sparta, WSK, BB, CR, Pandas)
That is the only reason we ever grew in size right at the start of the age.

I can sign under the rest.

---

This is possible without dealbreaking other KDs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Anri

This is possible without dealbreaking other KDs.

---

Its correct but why you never done it too. So far you full deserve this **** situation but most like rest from ppl in kd are innocent victims.

yea not sure anyone would war you now if you are even in size to war them anymore.
at any rate warring is not the same as blocking.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Goodwitch

what wait who suggested blocking as terms?

---

Blocking is the term the nonPanda KD uses for this war and with dealing with us while I think its a real war with a prospect of a true winner emerging in about 2 weeks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Goodwitch

yea not sure anyone would war you now if you are even in size to war them anymore.
at any rate warring is not the same as blocking.

---

I don't know why tho, turned out Pandas or non Pandas used a bad strategy and counted on us withdrawing at min time...
I am sure other Kingdoms like WSK or Emeriti would never do it the way they did it.

If CR goes for any crown with this troll set up I might cry/die

Emeriti would've had a 100+ page thread by now if this happened to them kek

1. most would not war someone known to cheat
2. the ones that do, there are others that wouldn't let you because they would think your next cheating action would be to farm out acres

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Goodwitch

1. most would not war someone known to cheat
2. the ones that do, there are others that wouldn't let you because they would think your next cheating action would be to farm out acres

---

Who is cheating?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Elit

Its correct but why you never done it too. So far you full deserve this **** situation but most like rest from ppl in kd are innocent victims.

---

stop living in the past.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by makeo

You're breaking those bonds yourself though.

:)

You know your behaviour was wrong. Hence you will lose people.

This isn't Bio vs Cats when they had a reason to rally.

This is "deal breaking scum " attempt to rally.

Never works. :p

---

These bonds cannot be broken. He will not lose anyone. He has earned the highest level of respect. The KD works together 100%. TIL VALHALLA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Anri

stop living in the past.

---

If you ever start lead KD again and refer to past i will remind it to you :P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jwuzi

Emeriti would've had a 100+ page thread by now if this happened to them kek

---

Thats correct. Only my post will be like 50 pages. Giving history lessons to ASF/Jdorje, QQ for clowBin and Advising Lennox to find better Kd!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pierniczek

Who is cheating?

---

you were. it will take a long time before others will take your word for anything.

If there were cheating, Bishop would take care of it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Goodwitch

you were. it will take a long time before others will take your word for anything.

---

Please give an example.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pierniczek

Please give an example.

---

http://i343.photobucket.com/albums/o...er37/fulla.gif

BURNNNN

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Elit

If you ever start lead KD again and refer to past i will remind it to you :P

---

Lets agree to disagree.

1) You DB a KD.
2) We break our CF to AMA and GB you because you DB a KD.
3) You claim we DB you when were actioning you for some stupid move you did.

Dito, i have no regrets about doing the right thing.

Now try concentrate on this age and not the crazy 50s

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bart of Sparta

http://i343.photobucket.com/albums/o...er37/fulla.gif

BURNNNN

---

hahahahaha

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Anri

Lets agree to disagree.

1) You DB a KD.
2) We break our CF to AMA and GB you because you DB a KD.
3) You claim we DB you when were actioning you for some stupid move you did.

Dito, i have no regrets about doing the right thing.

Now try concentrate on this age and not the crazy 50s

---

You have done so many bad decisions over ages not only DB x2 against AMA. Yes you deal broke us x2 but when you was in warring chart you razed KDs oow and GB them. So you deserve getting pay back for it.

I think the ghetto could have dragged this war out and won it. Think FS vs. Pyro 2 ages ago.

So in that respect I would have liked to see it play out.

But they were only in that position because of a dealbreak so I have no sympathy for them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Meep

I think the ghetto could have dragged this war out and won it. Think FS vs. Pyro 2 ages ago.

So in that respect I would have liked to see it play out.

But they were only in that position because of a dealbreak so I have no sympathy for them.

---

We are in a winning position cause of thier blunders in strategy. They had all the GC and time to train up and had provs pumped for conflict by the time they declared.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pierniczek

We are in a winning position cause of thier blunders in strategy. They had all the GC and time to train up and had provs pumped for conflict by the time they declared.

---

Yet you were a bunch of cowards that had no faith in yourself and felt the need to dealbreak to have any chance.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Korp

Yet you were a bunch of cowards that had no faith in yourself and felt the need to dealbreak to have any chance.

---

I actually thought that it was brave to tackle such an elite Kingdom, we knew they would try extra hard cause thier wrath would be tremendous.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pierniczek

I actually thought that it was brave to tackle such an elite Kingdom, we knew they would try extra hard cause thier wrath would be tremendous.

---

I guess you think stabbing someone in the back is brave as well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Korp

I guess you think stabbing someone in the back is brave as well.

---

They attacked us last age when we were unpreparred so it was also stabbing us in the back.


It's a tactic from The Art of War by Sun Tzu.

"Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected."

fact remains you broke a deal so others can't trust you anymore.

p.s. when i refer to cheating i am referring to deal breaks, double hostiles, 2 vs 1 wars etc. if it was against the game rules i wouldn't post, i would report

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pierniczek

They attacked us last age when we were unpreparred so it was also stabbing us in the back.


It's a tactic from The Art of War by Sun Tzu.

"Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected."

---

did they break an agreement to do so?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Elit

You have done so many bad decisions over ages not only DB x2 against AMA. Yes you deal broke us x2 but when you was in warring chart you razed KDs oow and GB them. So you deserve getting pay back for it.

---

DBx2 vs AMA because you DB others to get actioned by us. That is not a dealbreak in itself because it would never happen unless you have dealbroken others. How you fail to understand such a simple thing is amazing. You and pretty much the rest of the server believe people that DB should get actioned for it, yet you do not understand when others action you for the very same thing? Gotta love how your mind works.