i dont have homes right now because im doing a wiz pump, 70% guilds with my 145% BE, suck on it noobs that run 80%
Printable View
i dont have homes right now because im doing a wiz pump, 70% guilds with my 145% BE, suck on it noobs that run 80%
ordray i didnt fail at all, i got your throne at the first try, does it say i failed or was it someone else
I want to point out palems point with this thread, was just to have the title high homes = bad in the front of the strategy forum, so lazy people just read the title and assume high homes are bad.
It is a very cheap trick, kinda like what obama and all other polititians do. Anyway, i will remind everyone to please consider and try 45% homes, if your income is crap and you cant rebuild after a war or get anything done, high homes is for you
didnt i send you my loc already, let me read about your accurate explanations , because i was chained from 1400 to 500 acres or something like that with my avian warrior in age 49 and i ruled and owned, so maybe perhaps your explanation can be very accurate in the world of theories, but in practice, the avian warrior, testament of ubberness demonstrated the contrary
...yea...I'm sure.
And no, you haven't sent me your loc. That's why I'm still waiting for it.
...yea...I'm sure.
And no, you haven't sent me your loc. That's why I'm still waiting for it.
Oh, it definitely says you Gojete.
While you are correct in pointing out that politicians often give false or deceptive names and titles, Palem posted actual facts supporting his statement. You on the other hand have done nothing of the sort. Until you post something even slightly coherent in support of your side of the argument, the burden of proof is on you. And saying, "I've tried this and beat up tiny little ghetto KDs therefore it is superior to low-no home strats" doesn't count as proof.
Don't think that that wizard pump is going to help you much at that size.
You keep saying that high homes dont work against good kingdoms, again what you call good kingdoms are like 50 kingdoms in the whole of utopia, most player will never face a so called "good kingdom" , and seeing how last age ended with 700 kds, lets say 100 were fake kds, thats a lot of hundreds of kingdoms that people can war against using high homes for faster recovery times after war and faster everything.
I dont see why people has to suffer, a lot of ppl in the ghetto after war, end up fat and with no money to rebuild, no money to retrain, no money for nothing, no offense to plunder , no money to train thieves, a lot of ppl in the ghetto, war after war, sepend 2 weeks trying to recover, but its not possible because coming out of war they immediately lose their acres.
Maybe all of you super players from "good kds ", had never had this problem. of being stucked in wafter war protection time for 48 hours without the possibility of doing anything about it, but i have , and since i start winning wars, due to my superior strategies, i always made sure that righe before the war ended, all the acres i was winning and building credits went into rebuilding 40% home and 20% arms . This is planning ahead,
And you also seem to think that one runs the same strategy all the time.
Right now again, i need a science pump so i go 70% guilds, when i need to train army ill go 20% arms and 20% banks probably and so on, the constant factor is at least 35% homes, to ensure good income and faster training times, im sure that in all your theories and all your calculators and excel ****s and all your imaginary world , and due to your prejudices and close mindedness, you deem high homes as bad, but in the real world, in the ghetto, where 85% of the players live, high homes allow for greater flexibility, faster recovery times and increased fun with the game.
Right now everyone is coming out of war, or wars coming to an end, if you for whatever reason, are stucked in after war protection time, unable to do crap and frustrated and desperate cause it would take you 2 weeks to fully recover and retrain and all that, remember 2 words
HIGH HOMES
Haxor! He's running 105% acres built! 70% guilds + 35% homes = 105% = FAIL
Oh, and Gojete, how'd your most recent war go?
Ordray man you know , i just cant sit and do the math for you guys, youve been doing math for years, and math is math and numbers and numbers, but really what you call tiny ghettos , we beated up the best ghettos out of the top 100 . Maybe for you its not a big deal, but im sure that any kd outside the top 100 would love to be able to beat on eveyrone around them with a kingdom that was newly formed out of scratch, without having to wait several ages before achieving this success .
Right from scratch, newly formed kd, almost no one knows each other, and bam 5 war wins one age, and BAM 7 war wins next age.
I have to say that from the ppl that started the kd in age 49, half kd defected after 2 failed wars, and after that the superior players that stayed and strategies gave 5 war wins, and next age again some quit some stayed, half kd was new again, and new ppl came in the age and some left and there was a flow of ppl that you would not believe. its not like it was the same 15 players in both ages, i think the only players that were always the same was around 7 , so for a newly formed kd, to win 13 war wins straight, i think thats a pretty damn good accomplishment.
So you can try to undermine the wars and the victories but again i tell you, any kd outside top 100 can only dream about getting 7 wins in a row let alone 13 , This is ownization and domination, this is the epitome of ubberness, the pinnacle of masterization of all that is ubber and the pain and destruction superior skills, player focus into doom and damnation come together and result VICTORy One after another, VICTORY I GIVE YOU VICTORY
Im sure everyone outside the top 100 would love to have 7 war wins in a row in a single age, and 13 in a row in 2 ages, thats 13 war wins in a row for a kingdom outside the top 100.
I think again you are mixing terms , because you think for reasons i have previously pointed out, that you have an idea of what is being good and what is being better, that is fixated in your mind, this is nothing but a thought .
we lost that war just right now it was very sad,
Dudes please read man, come on, after bishop posted that im not running homes, i said no im not runing homes cause im doing a wiz pump,
when did i say i have 35% homes, see your doing too much math and it clouds your understanding
i find it hard to believe you have 15% BE science. at MOST a dorf will have natural 130 BE, where is the rest coming from. and how on earth is your BE at 100 + bonus if as you say you are currently NOT running homes.
thats not possible without being a dorf which you are and 20% in tools. which i seriously doubt you have that much science in the age without being a sage and without science pumping which you clearly have no time to do between plundering millions and using 70% guilds
ok firstly we have 72 hrs to recover now.
secondly if you are fat coming oow you will have the money to rebuild if you do it right. if you spend more then 3 days to recover you are doing it wrong or just have **** kingdom mates.
thirdly if you need to science pump you dont use 70% guilds ;-)
fourthly homes do not increase faster training time, IA does that and its a spell.
fifthly high homes does not mean increased fun in the game. i prefer to war and beat the **** out of ppl or get my ass beat and learn from it. having more homes or whatever does nothing to increase my pleasure with the game.
sixthly im inventing words now but it doesnt matter. location or gtfo