Is Shai the topic of this thread? No, didnt stop you talking about Shai though..
Printable View
I won't discuss people if you agree not to discuss people with me Korp, deal?
Why are you even in this thread? Do you play in Emeriti?
I don't, I'm just discussing the war and like I've told you I dislike BB.
It's something Sheister said about using salt in his commentary of the war and Shai seemed salty.
Offer still stands, you stay 100% on topic and I'll do it too.
Is that problem? How are you trying to solve it Korp?
Just permaban Matija and be done with the stupidity.
^+ this
Well the elite has decided. I'm too dumb to be allowed to post in this forum then?
On topic:
It seems Emeriti chain into overpop, I haven't checked SN to see what BB are doing.
If we're only allowing posting based off intelligence we might as well just pack the whole forum up and call it quits
Pls don't give bishop a chance to lock thread again like what he recently did on another.
Anyway, very nice match up war for both sides. It would be nice if either party can share with us the ops exchanges.
Hit wise, BB loves to start with a big raze before chaining while Emeriti hit as per norm.
And those massacre is brutal. Apparently, chained province who chose to keep offense and wizard and neglect every others suffer heavy losses from the massacre hits.
But besides the war, I am curious and like to ask the leaders from both kingdoms:
all along I thgt crowning is the top priority. but apparently this war and the earlier staring game seem to cost the chance of crown for both sides? is it worth? or the victory from the battles between the titans seem more worthy?
I think everyone involved has crowned a few times at least and would rather win the conflict (at least the people I talked to over the ages)
Any update on the war? Did a snatch news but could only grab from March 1st.
Looks like the acreage is very skewed, but the NW lead keeps changing hands.
April 12 of YR10 Happy Birthday Migz (7:8) has withdrawn from war. Our people rejoice at our victory!
BB knew this was a sure loss so they did a max gain wave and WD'ed.
Everyone (who knows the game) knew a kd with 10 faeries would win a war vs a kd who tried to win the landcrown by not running faeries, I advised em to go 0 TM's this age. They went 5. This conflict was decided before the age even started. It's the Freakstyle strategy. Lose half your land but ya never have to withdraw. Great in the war win tier, but whats the point for a kd like you or BB? Don't ya wanna gain land? You were laughably small pre-WD. Can BB just run 15 faes next age, have no chance at ever winning, and break your war win streak? Would you then feel defeated given everyone knows more faes = war wins?
That's been y'alls mistake like for 8 years now, people like you and proteus keep talking up your war win record as I've spent 8 years hit and running ya for crowns. This age y'all were both so stubborn to sit for 2 weeks before fighting the inevitable. congrats?
I played for landcrowns, not war wins. You warred BB, and looks like your land is in on the kd page and you ended up 30k behind. Appears as stupid as a setup in practice as I said upon seeing it, unless your goals are the WW crown. You're 16 points behind per the kd page on the WW rankings.
But as I said, I've been having that argument for damn near 8 years now. Abs cares about saying in the forums they got the war win, despite the multiple ages I'd hit and run em for a crown. Everyone has their own goals. Can't blame nesta for withdrawing up 70k acres ahead which then becomes 30k after your WW bonus. I just can't relate to picking a setup like 9 faes that never had a chance of winning pre-age, seems retarded to me. But congrats on 4/4? FS has been doing that for 30 ages. Beat FS and it'd actually be more impressive than finishing in 6th place.
Would have beaten BB in a b2b easy if we had the time, and if they didnt chicken out and WD and send you to claim some sort of victory in the forums we would have forced a auto win before EoA.
GTFO with your max gaining min time WD BS & your out-dated drunken meta
Ghetto plays man.
You had the inside track to crowning, yet were willing to just stare at us until eoa unless we gave you a free first wave in war, declining our repeated insta-war offers. Okay so we gave you the free first wave in war, just like you needed to have a chance to compete. This gave you an overwhelming advantage, from which you do a max-gain-min-time strat and withdraw. Which you're calling a win somehow?
Great, but the last time we warred you pulled the opposite propaganda, telling us to our faces you would withdraw if it was clear you were losing, then turning around and posting on the forums the exact opposite lie by admitting you gave up any chance of winning days before eoa just to hold onto acres until eoa saved you with 36 hours to spare.
Our strat was simple: get you to 50% nw by eoa. Job well done. But next round it won't be possible since there will only be 4 days til eoa and autowin can't kick in until 7. So I guess you'll be spared a second loss by pulling the same strat as last time, and call it a win again?
I don't even play anymore, but you've been doing the same strat for like 10 years. Make lots of UB TMs so you don't withdraw, but you mostly never gain land doing so. I'd think you'd realize your strategy sucks by now, assuming you value land. But if you prefer to never learn after 10 years, I'd prefer being able to get my ex-kd to a crown with like a 10 second consultation pre-age as to what to run half the ages, then take semi-credit for said crown with no work. You're sub 100k acres pre-wd with my suggested setup.
I mean best I can tell you burned 75% pool to donate to faes this age. Obv that'll never win ya a landcrown, c'mon now. I don't recall too many #1/#2 wars where the "winner" ended up 30k lower in recent memory. Well outside of like 5 times I fought emeriti/absalom logic and won crowns.
The main difference seems to be I learn from your actions, and you don't learn from ours.
Youre so full of Sh**. This is the first age we run t/m heavy since I joined emeriti. Sitting there semi-drunk making **** up are we?
And where are these crowns you advice them too? I havent seen one since i joined Em 15 months ago.
Go to bed flogger, you are 1/10th the strategist dorje is
Congrats Emeriti.
There were 2 ages I had access to dorje's simulator. The first I said "dicing dark elves will win this age" and dorje said "dicing dark elves are retarded." Dorje then got the rest of abs to not run dicing dark elves and ran them himself and won the age. The 2nd time I had access to his simulator we were the only cows to survive in absalom. He has good tools, I wish I had them back. But I've always been a better strategist, I'm just not a programmer.
Dorje is very good at not pressing a withdraw button. He doesn't balance that well with a counter strategy of attack time and hit and running. This has been a recurring theme for like 8 years before you even played in the top.
This age, I'm fairly sure I messaged both you and dorje me pretty much announcing your setup to nesta and him disagreeing with me before the age even started. Of course I was right as I always am. You're incredibly predictable, and most ages when I played and tried to win, I used that to outplay you as far as land crown aspirations. Every now and then I'd have an age where I'd try to do something crazy and they'd win. But it's not because I didn't know the right play, its cause I more wanted credit for doing something crazy.
Then again, there would be a few ages dorje would surprise me and do something smart, all def orcs one age max explore OOP was smart. Not realizing it wouldn't work the next age was not so smart. For example.
This is the first age we've run a war-tier strat. We typically run attacker-heavy strats since I like to farm people by min time, and I rely on them to actually withdraw after getting farmed min time. Thankfully BB has almost always done this when we've warred them.
All that changed last age, because now land is a major penalty to you. Which is dumb, but whatever, we adjust. We yo-yo'd too far though, with 9 t/ms. So this age strat our strat is pure war-tier, with a lack of attackers that makes it hard to gain by min time in any of our wars.
Next age who knows what it'll bring? I'm betting on another win over BB. Just let us know what you consider a "win" before hand though if you're not going to call a win a win though, so that we can again adjust.
Good job Emeriti
You messgaged me and thought I was 7:20 or something. You missed on my setup thats for sure. And then when you found out you spammed me some BS about how much it sucked Then we made fools out of BB by doing the Auto-CF ingame after wrecking Joro's prov +2 others. (making them change the mechanics for nxt age)
Outplayed your side all age and had fun doing it, crowning it with a nice WW here.
Also Dorje doesnt sim-sh1t. He is a jazz-musician jamming your ass off