Originally Posted by
crixilver
I would shift the audience to 'an evolved community' than 'an evolved human being', though Nietezsche probably had intended it as such.
There are people who would hold onto such mental/cultural constructs such as morality, religion, virtues, as innate to their selves, what defines humanity, and other philosophically warm ideas, eg. 'products of evolutionary heritage'.
I submit that these ideas are only valued and propagated because they are, simply and harshly put, beneficial for the community, or in your words, 'useful for an evolved human being'.