Printable View
Sanc didnt wait for 7 hits... They sent dragon then attacked the bank a tick before simians even waved... Sanc awaited simians to leave fort and as soon as they did they started hitting simians.. Get fact correct and then comment plz enough trolls hereQuote:
Originally Posted by Palem
Oh, excuse me, let me correct myself.
Sanc starts and sends a dragon.
Starts bank hits
Sees Simians wave HoH
Then decides to double hostile and waves Simians
My bad. You're right that makes it look much better.
u're best friends with sims now? I guessed them having 20k+ acres of your land makes you feel connected with them somehow.Quote:
Originally Posted by Palem
It does actually. It's amusing to try to soley blame Sanc as the bad guy for taking part in a situation Simians voluntarily put themselves in. I won't lean one way or the other in who is truly wrong or right, but I understand Sanc's point of view, and the point of view that Simians is double hostiled. But I know for a fact that it's Simians fault for being where they are.Quote:
Originally Posted by Palem
Be careful Palem or you can end like me and be named "bigot". :D
Yes i fail to see how Sanctuary waving Simians after they waved hoh is any different from DOUBLE HOSTILE. Yes you send dragon and hit cow but got zero hits in return. Its say clear enough Simians wont war Sanctuary. Free grab on cow is good enough to let them war 1vs1 other kd. There is no reason to go so far and wave them when its clear hoh will war simians.
Now its remind me age 45. Sanctuary did bonce wave x2 smaller kd with cow. I waved them 1h later and ABS told its was Double hostile. This small kd never declare war or hit sanc back and Simians are in war now with hoh. Can you compare both situations?
I dont know why ppl blame hoh. They didn't make anything wrong.
If i've been hit on by a kd who wants to war me and sends dragon at me, it would absolutely stupid for me to wave another kd. Come on Palem, have you ran a proper warring kd before? How can it be double hostile when it shows acts of aggresion and Simians put themselves in this dumbass situation. If they didn't want this, they shouldn't have noticed Sanctuary & Rage.Quote:
Originally Posted by Palem
This is getting more and more ridiculous. Just let HoH & Simians fight it out.
Something to note here, Simians will hold a war button on Sanc once their war ends with HoH, so to call it a fake tag is not accurate.Quote:
Originally Posted by Palem
We already predicted this dumb scenario earlier in this thread the moment Anri noticed 3 kd's. That he will put himself into a situation where he will be doubled or tripled hostiled and he would cry and gain sympathy so all you jokers out there could cry over this scenario.
Btw Elit stop your abs propaganda and thread derailment once again. Just let HoH vs Sims and watch it unfold.
Actually its what did rage age 51 and blamed after it rest 2 kds for his choice. Sure simians didn't act so proper, because they should know Its not first time when ABS kd in same situation act same and keep hit his target ever if he waved another kd. Its was hard situation for Simians.Quote:
Originally Posted by tak3shi
Gave notice all same time was very bad move. Yes most possible there will be notice from sanctuary right after simians notice hoh, but you will have legit reason to tell them your "hostile" with hoh are first and they need to hold it for finish.
In short Sanctuary is double more lame for get advantage on newbie for being so n00b.
So when you call Palem n00b (Palem, have you ran a proper warring kd before?) for argument its not ABS propaganda but when i state facts is abs propaganda? This topic is for Simians and all involved.Quote:
Originally Posted by tak3shi
Okay... this has to be said, notice in this instance means nothing more than a kingdom telling other kingdoms they are breaking relations. It does not necessarily mean thatQuote:
Originally Posted by tak3shi
he is going to hostile all three of them.
PS: By quoting and talking to him you are pushing Elit into his anti-abs bs.... maybe you should just ignore him.
Of course not, but it does make 3 kingdoms available to hostile you at the same time. It was stupid to do it, and what's happening now is a direct result of their own actions. If the goal was to just make all 3 train, then stagger the notices, with your preferred target being first.Quote:
Originally Posted by flutterby
Not stupid. It was risky to do it, but smart. The chance of a multi-hostile was the risk, and is what happened. Claiming that giving a kingdom notice is a reason to multi hostile and partaking in a multi hostile is also smart, but it comes with it's own risk, in this case being a returned favor and loss at the chance of future relationships.Quote:
Originally Posted by DHaran
The mistake Simians made was publicly announcing that it was their intention to force these kingdoms to train. They should have simply said that the CF's were expiring soon anyway and so they thought it in their best interest to break them open until new CF's could be arranged. This would have been more.. "acceptable."
What Simians wanted to do was correct just they made it wrong. Gave notice all kds with 5-6h window can work better with less risk and keep dor open for diplomatic talk from begin and re-cf.
Ezzerland is very right too.
I hate most when people ask stupid question or gave stupid examples and take rest for idiots. Its what "he is doing". So far i don't agree most from time with ASF but he never talk stupid. He can give you very good arguments ever if he understand he is complete wrong :DQuote:
Originally Posted by flutterby
Well he never think he is wrong and its his main problem :P
But Anri likes the circus show surrounding Simians to be big.