You keep talking about day 7, but there is no rule forcing you to use auto-win if you don't have you. The other kingdom could have WD and didn't, that's their problem, not csarmi's. He has every right to fight and gain as many acres as he can.
Printable View
You keep talking about day 7, but there is no rule forcing you to use auto-win if you don't have you. The other kingdom could have WD and didn't, that's their problem, not csarmi's. He has every right to fight and gain as many acres as he can.
Well said... Best!Quote:
Originally Posted by Orin
The game and its players always made the rules. Why do you even think terms excist on a CF?
Why do you even think you have a rule that says we are not allowed to hit into another war?
Who made these rules? Why arent we allowed to take down #1 man on this server to win?
We dont play to win? Csarmi sure played to win and farm to win! I think we were very nice that we even came to discuss this matter. If we had wanted we just hit and answer to no one. But a open communication is always good. I think somewhere along the time after day 7 we became the judge if you want me to really answer that question. This is when we started to get upset about his farming when we knew the war could be won at any moment. This is when we understod that the longer he is in war the harder he will be to compete against later this age. The longer he is in war the bigger chance he has to win #1. The longer the war goes on in farming style with purpose the less of a chance we have to win at all.
Imagine being #2 or #3 and see someone sitt in a farm war. Winning by farming and you cant do anything about it. Just see his acres grow and grow. Watch how he stays OOR from getting auto-wd just to keep farming. Watch his players TBs getting destroyed and him trying his best to masquerade the illussion that he aint farming, he is just warring.
What pisses us the most off is that he have not admitted it and acts openly as if this was a hard fight. A fight he could have won whenever he wanted. Despite of us attacking him. Do you get this? We are here to win, your leader farms hardcore and in very hard to notice style. But he did it. Cards on the table here. So we razed him for it. Why wouldnt we do that?
We shall allow farming???!
I dont think soo. Bishop always said the server should police itself. Guess what. We just did!!!!!!!
He was #1 player and it comes with a responsibility. Either you farm to win or you win with style. He choosed to be greedy and farm to win so we choose to raze him down a notch. We have every right to take his acres just as he had every right to choose to farm those acres. Server will always police itself.Quote:
Originally Posted by DHaran
He was wrong to farm and become greedy. If he had not farmed so hard we would have let him keep the acres. Enough was enough all ready.
Apparently you think so since you did farm out last age.Quote:
We shall allow farming???!
No, server was free to police it Korp. I said all ready what we did was nasty and wrong but we did it to hurt Sanctuary. I am sry that Rage got hurt in the process of it.
Lets just say we return the acres for the fun of it. All order is restored. Csarmi wins by farming.
What a happy crowd we all would be...
What about leaving off with that day 7 BS? We could never have won this by day 7 on nw. Even if the ww on 50% nw occured to us earlier (it occured to us on day 9 or so when we were gaining about 200-250k nw/day and they kept losing about 100-200k nw/day). At day seven we were 7.4 mill and they were 4.7 mill. I had 27k acres and about 3.7 mill nw. Can anyone honestly claim that I could'v had 2 MILLION nw more? That' 500k troops. I had about 360k peasants at that point (on average) with plague on about 2/3 of the time and an income of about 1.8-2 mill gc / 4-5k soldiers per hour after expenses.
This is such a ridiculous BS that really, I don't even know what to say?
What do you do when someone claims that a white sheet of paper is black?
Naw keep bickering its much more entertaining. I mean for the maybe 300 people that care about crowning u guys certainly do well to entertain the other 4k players or so that are active enough to read the forums/watch the top.Quote:
Originally Posted by Anri
Never said anything about taking the no #1 down , see your trying to twist your words into still trying to make a BS justification for an IW hit..simple.
that's what it was all about... the IW hit. you could have waited to EOW CF , but you blatantly ignored the community rule of not hitting IW , and trying to justify your action with BS reasons.
your taking the opposing KD for fools and they were not.
and FYI , just because i have a low post count doesn't mean im a noob , i just never had the urge to post in the forum , and i've been around for a bit.
this will makes you a winnerQuote:
Originally Posted by Anri
wise anri
TBS: "while he cant both defend himself and help his kd/train up what he can to be able to continue hitting and be UB in his war."
If you cant aid kd and pump prov with: 3-5 mil gc income + 2-4 mil gc tog + 5-9k soldiers drafted / h , and for his UB he was far from not UB to his oponents so there where no problem there.
SyPTo: "RULE : This will only occur after a minimum of 7 days (1 Utopian year).
where does it states it CANNOT last longer then 7 days ?...nowhere , exactly why it's BS for you to still try and justify an IW hit. i'll say it again , who made you judge ,jury and executioner ? "
Yes a war can be longer BUT your monarch hade it in his intresst to make it last as long as posible and made 0 effort of end it aka A FARM WAR!!!!!!!! there for after 10 days we made our self judge ,jury and executioner , or you can look at it as he did make us it/ do it!
DHaran: "You keep talking about day 7, but there is no rule forcing you to use auto-win if you don't have you. The other kingdom could have WD and didn't, that's their problem, not csarmi's. He has every right to fight and gain as many acres as he can. "
Ofc no rule but this is exactly what make it Farm war and why we hit into it.
csarmi: "What do you do when someone claims that a white sheet of paper is black? "
call him/here a racist!
We would have had no reason to take someone down that had no chance of winning #1 for this age.Quote:
Originally Posted by SyPTo
Csarmi gave us a reason to take him down. We felt it was enough of farming made so we made the move.
Its nothing wierd about it. Csarmi also knew we were watching his steps of the war and as we saw it we had enough.
Like you say you could have won, in more then one way even. I understand everyone wants to gain the most and it was a good tactic. But when it comes to winning the age or losing the age the farming has to end. It is a ****ing slap on our face if someone sitts in war and farms acres and have super economy purposely and he wins the age by doing it. Cmon now. I understand Csarmi gets upset also. But its not about the win. You could have got that after we hit him also. He should have taken the win and stop his farming. Ofc some people gonna think its enough. The rest was in CF so what they gonna do really? We were the ones to hit him down. For the best competition of all banks. He is left on a place where he can still win this age if he has some skills. I think it was more then fair of us. We could have waited til EoW and wasted a few bounce waves on him and tried to get him open that way. This was the fastest way and his farming for #1 POSITION gave us the reason. He should have tought this over a bit more.
We are not entirely opposing of giving him acres back. But then he wins by farming. This is okey to the entire community?
Its just a bit to much for my taste really. But there seem to be a huge demand to let farmers win at this game.
Anri show is always entertaining. Keep digging the hole sir!
Oh like you got farmed last age lewlsQuote:
Originally Posted by Anri