thanks for thinking that; here's a penny for your thoughts - you can keep the change.
Printable View
thanks for thinking that; here's a penny for your thoughts - you can keep the change.
women deal with dishes
men bash
LOL
you think ascension is a SK?!
lol /me recalls last time someone from ascension called them a super kd...
naturally leadership denied that they were a skd
logs plz
I'd like logs too please :p
Also - So it's either your a Super KD or your a ghetto? I feel a debate coming on. Also If you consider top 50 SKD, well when was the last time Ascension didn't finish within the top 40?
On another note: Before our kd getting raped and mass deleted/defected by a traitor in our kd we we're #12 for honor.. with the #1 Ranked honor player in the world. Hardly ghetto Sir.
btw poei, not to get sidetracked too much, people in 15mil kds still hit into 7mil kds even tho they get penalized is because there are just no targets, so reduced acres ares still better than 0 acres.
rofl were in your channel no need to spam flames here
nexus, i consider top 8-9 or so as a supekingdom. Top 10-20 is good kds. Anything below is a ghetto.
SKs are a myth there are only ghettos, if SKs existed that category would be more exclusive than to include the whole top 50 though :)
hehe, im not at home on irc :p im at work or i would join you there! But i will be home in about an hour or so to join the festivities
im already banned in fact my nick was on auto kick from the last incident i had with ur ghetto
well kain, he wanted a chart analogy, thats as close as i can make it. but i agree you're right that those no longer exist anymore
KNRG have been around for ages.
It was removed from war in age 32.
Saying that KNRG has no impact on gains is foolish. Hitting into much smaller kingdoms can yeld you down to 60% of the gains you would have when hitting someone in a kingdom your size.
Furthermore, contrary to what OP said, this promotes bottomfeeding, not discourages it. When you are in a big kingdom looking for a random grab, KNRG means that you cannot afford to take retal, because you'd lose more land than what you'd gain. This implies that you have to make fully safe hits, and thus hit into much smaller kingdoms.
So I can wave kingdoms 30% bigger than mine and fear nothing because they cannot press the war button? That's an awful concept. There should be no limit to war declarations. If you want to adress fake wars, try adressing the reason why fake wars exist instead of attempting to find flawed ways of preventing them.Quote:
Also, the NW range for war declaration should be reduced to perhaps 80-120% to discontinue fake wars.
its hardly alliance powerplaying that leads to certain kds showing up in the top but rather activity level, organization and setup choice..
i also dont see the need of pampering big provs in small kds.. if people learn to grow with their kd instead of going on a selfish mission then they dont end up being bottomfed on to the same extent. Either way the game is already in their favour as it is, no need to make that even worse than it currently is.
toadi
you really cant afford retals regardless of knrg. wouldnt say that this really affects the bottomfeeding by itself other than that the point where its crap to attack happens earlier.. but that just means the kd thats next in line will get the hits.. so overall it changes little.