FS vs. QoA

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

11-10-2016, 22:15
2Utopian

Quote:

Originally Posted by Persain

However, what requires ALOT of skill is province management pre war, correct builds, early war adjustments/targeting. A single feary mystic on say 0 WT could get crushed, or a rogue on .5 wpa gets ET'ed to hell. An attacker geting chained army in and falling apart, any of those things can make their setup incredibly vulnerable as they end up costing them the war. Worse kds couldn't pull that off at all and would lose to "worse" setups due to early miss plays.

Exactly my point.
11-10-2016, 22:23
LoRD_SaMPuaN

Quote:

Originally Posted by Persain

Its a very easy setup that doesnt require skill once you have it working & going. Like right now in war, all freakstyle has to do is blindly cast FB, NS, prop, MS and add as many acres as leadership tells them to do. Their t/m's dont even need great activity just loging in every 4-5 hours when awake and geting a good nights sleep. A monkey could almost run their t/m's. Similarly their attackers are almost all hollowed out as long as they run army-in-army-out and follow leadership target advise to keep decent incoming theres no "skill" left.

To take off your dress (FS) monkey Fa/He Baroness 2,827 594k

when monkey runs the prov, it ends up to be the only breakable one..
11-10-2016, 22:29
Persain

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoRD_SaMPuaN

To take off your dress (FS) monkey Fa/He Baroness 2,827 594k

when monkey runs the prov, it ends up to be the only breakable one..

lol <3.
11-10-2016, 23:04
noobium

Seriously you guys are congratulating Fartstyle? They started with a 40k acre lead and time to pump. The only was Fartstyle loses is if they are utterly incompetent. This is a faker war than Trump.
11-10-2016, 23:25
s7ark

Quote:

Originally Posted by noobium

Seriously you guys are congratulating Fartstyle? They started with a 40k acre lead and time to pump. The only was Fartstyle loses is if they are utterly incompetent. This is a faker war than Trump.

time to pump what? science?
11-10-2016, 23:34
2Utopian

Quote:

Originally Posted by s7ark

time to pump what? science?

Just wow, and this is coming from someone who goes out of his way to forum war noobium.
12-10-2016, 08:54
StratOcastle

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2Utopian

Just wow, and this is coming from someone who goes out of his way to forum war noobium.

And I hope this is sarcasm of sarcasm. I learned that out here to.
12-10-2016, 09:02
MyNameIsMatija

Sarcasm of sarcasm would basically be your sincere thoughts put into writing? I have yet to master this craft. Always one step ahead of me Strato.

/end sarcasm of sarcasm
12-10-2016, 09:31
Panthira

We warred FS, and they weren't that bad (didn't obliterate us) considering they were way more pumped, slightly larger, and way more experienced than I am. It was a fun war and I learned a lot. They were fairly honorable players in that experience, I think my first with FS. I was a king in that war.

I woukd like to see Manatee go up against FS.
12-10-2016, 11:41
StratOcastle

When I get off work I can be rebuttalistic from the cigar lounge. Once smoking I can start using words and phrases like "boulderdash" and "preposterous" in regards to warring.
12-10-2016, 12:51
trekguy

Quote:

Originally Posted by StratOcastle

When I get off work I can be rebuttalistic from the cigar lounge. Once smoking I can start using words and phrases like "boulderdash" and "preposterous" in regards to warring.

Its balderdash unless you're playing a 1980s Commodore game. ;)
12-10-2016, 13:29
bluorr

I`ve studied FS through the past couple of ages. Strategy wise, planning, speculating - they`re pro. However, they tend to always war from a leading position. A too big lead, which renders most of their wars on the farm side of life. That`s why I find them boring to follow, but they do get results.
12-10-2016, 14:20
Dean21

Didn't FS war Spartans at start of age being #15 KD vs #1 (Sparta) at the time 18k vs 23k acres (almost 30% bigger)? still rekt them? Also, don't think they had a war where they were bigger than opponent this age. it's not theirs fault they pump better and have higher nw but land wise, smaller or equal
12-10-2016, 18:00
Bart of Sparta

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dean21

Didn't FS war Spartans at start of age being #15 KD vs #1 (Sparta) at the time 18k vs 23k acres (almost 30% bigger)? still rekt them? Also, don't think they had a war where they were bigger than opponent this age. it's not theirs fault they pump better and have higher nw but land wise, smaller or equal

We were bigger, but they had significantly more NW/military/everything (our banks had only just explore, land still incoming). Size only matters if you can pump it. We still pulled out equal/slightly up. FS is good though, definitely.
12-10-2016, 18:24
citadela01

We often get called out for warring from superior position only, i think that rep is not based on facts and more often than not is result of us winning the war before button is even pressed.
However outpumping for arranged wars and superior hostile play is part of conflict itself.

I am sure there will be people who will say the same for this war, not only clueless noobs only notable for their bad strategy advice, but persons of merit as well.

Personally i think QoA started this war from superior position, since per war agreement we allowed them to hit all our tm's down to 3k under their core range and establish theirs own upwards of 4k range.
They got initial foothold with large ub's and we agreed to give them button in a manner that allowed them to get 2 war waves in before we did our first.

All that said war is still very much undecided.

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page