Quote:
I just find it ironic that last age before Emeriti was set to fight BB, a FSU kingdom with a bunch of ex-BB members hit down Emeriti's cows and refused to give any land back. When this happens, Emeriti is accused of arranging farm wars even though they lost their cows and had only modest gains largely from the ww bonus.
But you dont find ironic that how a ex Emeriti member just happends to raze the top contender of Emeriti under the false pretense that BB didnt "respond" fast enough. I just dont get this logic of yours, "Its okey to ****play as long as you say oyu are sorry and offer acres back" The damage is already done, its not that acres were lost thats the issue is the fact that the ****play occurred from the begining.
Quote:
In addition, after all this is done, logs came out that BB advised Pyro to wave ED into their hostile with FS in addition to a bunch of other **** play by BB's alliance.
Emeriti did advice that Bour should raze BB, whats the difference?
Quote:
In short, I'm not saying Bour razing was fine or that Emeriti advising him to threaten to raze to get a cf was fine, but I am saying that BB are hypocrites and the real reason that BB wanted Emeriti gb'd is because Emeriti was #1 and owned BB in 1v1 wars each of the last two ages and Bb knew that it'd happen again this age unless they changed the rules like by deal breaking and waving into active war.
Coming from somone that demand that people should quit playing Utopia after ingame actions, its pretty funny. :)