Korp, are you drunk again lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by Korp
Printable View
Korp, are you drunk again lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by Korp
So while you would act the same way zulu did just cause its a different kingdom its a huge conspiracy?Quote:
Originally Posted by Swagger
You seem to grow more dull with age. You call me drunk while you disregard the fact that Swagger predicts what David is saying based on that zulu didnt give up on his age.Quote:
Originally Posted by Avenger
You literally just assumed what my intentions were while attacking me for assuming that Zulus kd isn't removed from rankings. I'm starting to think you're just drumming up spice to pretend these forums aren't dead.
Isnt that what you are doing? Making provocative statements based on very lose connections. "zulu didnt give up on his age" "David must have told them they arent removed from rankings" "very concering"? :) While at the same time you wouldnt act any other way than zulu did act.Quote:
Originally Posted by Swagger
It's almost like you don't know the full picture (cause you're on a strike against discord or something) and you're just blabbering...Quote:
Originally Posted by Korp
Let's all take a moment to remember Korp was voted worst utopia troll...
Coming to a possible conclusion based on behaviour and evidence, such provocative.Quote:
Originally Posted by Korp
Thats the fall back tactics of all idiots, "You're a troll" like that somehow would make any argument invalid.Quote:
Originally Posted by Memster
Did I say you were right or wrong? Just bringing up the point you were voted worst troll
How is zulus behaviour any evidences of what David has said or not said? We have zulu that didnt give up on his age after this setback (which you admitted previously that you wouldnt either do you would keep going). We have zulu admitting that he talked with David, which is only natural since it was his kingdom that was involved.Quote:
Originally Posted by Swagger
I said I would behave as zulu is IF I got confirmation from David that I wasn't removed from rankings. You're arguing against yourself now, do better.Quote:
Originally Posted by Korp
Have to defend this demation of character :( Since its a reoccuring "argument"Quote:
Originally Posted by Memster
And we have precedent set that this kind of behavior leads to removing from charts. Whether or not swagger thinks they will or will not be actioned doesn't matter. So who really cares, the man can have his own opinions and speculations.
So, what was the "No" answer for? I have to do better while you are totally avoiding the subject and chosing to focus your whole post on one small side track?Quote:
Originally Posted by Swagger
I guess the more interesting part is that how he came to the conclusion. "Zulu didnt give up David must have told them they wont be removed"Quote:
Originally Posted by Memster
OK I'm being trolled. The "no" answer was to the question quoted, that I'm trying to remove them from competion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Korp
But how is this rule handled though, there is plenty of room for abuse in the scenario. Previously we had the clear case of Bart and Sparta, Bart being the leader of the kingdom and the one who cheated it seems a clear case, removed from the chart. But in this case it wasnt zulu that conspired to cheat with the enemy kd but players within the kingdom. You could easily screw up someones age with planting players in the kd, create a fake war and bam removed from the rankings and their age ruined. Obviously it goes the other way as well, the monarch can let some players do the dirty work, get the eowcf and still in the rankings (if now thats the case).
No, that was a honest mistake, i was convinced that you finally manned up and did give a clear answer to my intial question. My bad.Quote:
Originally Posted by Swagger
The only difference between this and Sparta is that Zulu is claiming ignorance and bart bragged about it.
If zulu isn't actioned then the moral of the story is recruit people that might ****play, but don't let them tell you about it if they do.
Ask a none yes or no question and challenge manhood if they don't answer yes or no, I'm gonna steal that one!Quote:
Originally Posted by Korp
How is "Would you give up" not a yes or no question? "Yes cause x and y" "No cause Y and X"Quote:
Originally Posted by Swagger
OK, well let's use an analogy. Let's say I enter into a marathon. My ONLY goal is to get 1st place. Anything less than 1st is absolute failure, and a waste of my time. If in the first mile, a judge runs up beside me and says "Sir, you shorts are too short, your balls are hanging out, we are going to disqualify you, but you may finish the race if you want," I am going to quit the race. If the judge runs up to me and says "Sir, your shorts are too short, your balls are hanging out, we might disqualify you, but we need to discuss it more" I am going to keep running. If the judge runs up to me and says "Sir, your shorts are too short, your balls are hanging out, but we are going to let you finish and not penalize you, also your balls are magnificent" then I am going to keep running.Quote:
Originally Posted by Korp
As you can see, there are 3 possible outcomes, a yes or no answer cannot effectively answer a question with 3 variables.
To summarize
Yes I was actioned = Stop
Might be actioned = Keep going
Not actioned = Keep going.
Edit: I should add that by "actioned" I mean removed from rankings
But they were actioned. So that would be a yes then?Quote:
Originally Posted by Swagger
I added an edit to clarify what I meant by actioned
But we can only work with known variables, we know that they got actioned for fake warring, which things happend is listed by zulu in a previous posts. The third variable is unknown and hence it cant be in the equation.
But now its just arguing for the sake of arguing. We derailed from the actual topic awhile ago so enough is enough. You are ofc entitled to your opinions and etc. So toodels!
Ttyl Korp! I hope if you got anything out of this discussion it was a visualization of my balls!
Why you dont want Zulu to crown swagger? Get ZuLu a crown.
Swagger has reached proteus levels of nonsense
Best post so far!Quote:
Originally Posted by StratOcastle
Well I have talked with zulu and have proof that they won't be removed from charts, so my nonsense is actually fact!Quote:
Originally Posted by Pillz
GL to zulu and co, the age is long but you're off to a good start!
The nonsense is that kds should just disband for an age after being removed from the charts at eoa. Might as well just mass delete all kds caught cheating, retard.Quote:
Originally Posted by Swagger
More entertained by Swagger v Korp in the age old battle of "But you said X so I said Y and therefore Z" than by the actual subject matter. Good derailing.
The nonsense is that it's beneficial to have people in your kd blatantly cheat.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pillz
Korp vs Pam was always my favourite but we take what we can get in these forum reduced tiems. :'(Quote:
Originally Posted by Verminator
I know. They were like a Guy Ritchie script.Quote:
Originally Posted by makeo
Having provinces getting deleted is beneficial?Quote:
Originally Posted by Swagger
But all depends on, if now zulu had no part of it at all and the rest of the kd and he were totally unaware of the connection and the setup of the war it would be very unfair towards them as well. Getting punished for something x amount of individuals did.
In this case, yes it was. They stole $100 and paid a $50 fine. The province's that got deleted were immediately replaced and dumped pool within hours.Quote:
Originally Posted by Korp
Do not insult usersQuote:
Originally Posted by Pillz
No deleting the post? No ban? Just repeatedly asking the same two or three users nicely to 'stop insulting users' and hoping they eventually comply?Quote:
Originally Posted by Palem
It's pillz, his insults are a sign of endearment, like a peck on the cheek.
I hate all of your avatars. But the change makes me imagine mickster as a swiftfag and that's amusing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Palem
Anyways, there is no logic in removing kds from rankings anyways. Cheating and 'cheating' and **** play all just stem from a interest in the game....zauper and hawk probably being the text book examples.
Obviously punishment is necessary but I figure full reset ala pewpew? is more effective than deleting or removing from rankings.