The developers said the war was fake, punished Pew pew, but rewarded you with an eowcf. How is that so hard to understand?Quote:
Originally Posted by Korp
Printable View
The developers said the war was fake, punished Pew pew, but rewarded you with an eowcf. How is that so hard to understand?Quote:
Originally Posted by Korp
For a win we didnt even need for crown, unlike SWEA, who needed those acres to win, yet no punishment. Bishop admitted to letting SWEA win. Bishop removed 8 wins from us for 1 FW, when we only needed 7 to win crown because of our in-game actions towards the KD HE PLAYS IN WHILE BEING IN A POSITION HE IS IN. Bishop is bias, end of story. Its more than clear from this thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by Araqiel
As jessie would say, CRYSTAL!
Yes, you were going for war wins which is why you traded your acres for a war win - this is win trading. All kds that wintraded or fixed wars for war win crown got their wins reset. Bias would be if you were treated differently to those other kingdoms, you weren'tQuote:
Originally Posted by Sig
SWEA were allowed a partial eowcf, you'd rather they were dumped out of war so you can vulture them. That would be as unfair as allowing them a 4 day eowcf.Quote:
Originally Posted by Araqiel
SWEA/PP weren't going for ww crown :/Quote:
Originally Posted by Araqiel
Punishment was dealt out. Pew was suspended (for not hitting back) and SWEA lost the war win (They would have comfortably won... they lsot war win = punishment). AMA does not get to dictate who wars whom. If AMA did not hit into the war and pew still hit out the same punishments would have been handed out. It sucks but from SWEA's point of view they were warring. Like Bishop has said how can he do stuff based on what the community believes?Quote:
Originally Posted by Elit
Strippers case, if you get caught once you have probably done it before. The fact you got caught red handed meant severe punishment had to be handed out which it was. Will you do win trading again from here on out? Hopefully not as you have learnt your lesson which is what the punishment set out to do.
The end of the day AMA **** played the server, the server reacted. That is out of the developer's and Bishop's hands. Next time do not **** play your allies/others. Maybe if this happened towards EOA and you haden't shat upon Pew they would not have run to war with SWEA, simians they would not have GB you and strippers. What happened when ABs started **** playing people? The community reacted and made aABs which worked to some extent... but some wanted more.
*Edit*
Araq... even if Bishop did delete all of SWEA / Pew's WWs it would have achieved nothing on the land/crown race.
We didnt need this war to crown, like i said, so it is not the same as a KD who needed the win for the crown. You were overly severe in your punishment of this win-trade because of the fact that YOU PLAY IN A KD WE ABUSED ALL AGE (robbed gc). BIAS.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bishop
You seem very dense, the devs didnt say anything. Its only Bishop hes a game admin, you been told this repeatedly but you dont seem to grasp it yet. We did what any kd would have done, we took advantage of the hostility between Pewpew and AMA, hey thanks to AMA we would never been able to farm these acres to begin with. But nothing you say is any proof of cheating, i mean how is getting "rewarded" as you put it cheating.Quote:
Originally Posted by Araqiel
You got the standard punishment, nothing more and nothing less. You are not a special snowflake.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sig
So SWEA were immune from punishment because you didn't have logs of them offering anything in return?Quote:
Originally Posted by Bishop
AMA had every right to vulture their acres back. Pewpew suicided on their bank and AMA had no way of getting them back.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bishop
Plus it was unfair on every other top 10 kingdom to allow SWEA to keep those acres, with only 25% gains on them, for over a third of the remaining age. You completely blocked anyone from being able to do anything about the situation. How is that 'fair'?
What WOULD have be fair was to reset SWEA to their numbers before the fake war. They were perfectly capable of crowning without the admins assistance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bishop
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bishop
No, you said its standard if the war win was needed for a crown. I have said this 4x now, we had the WW crown secured with 7 wins, this was our 8th. Not the same. I am a unique snowflake, and you are a BIAS admin who plays the same game you ban people in.
There is no 'standard punishment'. FREE reported a fake war, both kingdoms got immediately kicked out into normal stance and some provs were deleted.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bishop
What do you class as 'standard punishment'?
The actual fairest thing to do would have been to roll back the game to the ticks before it happened ****ing over 6000 people to keep 25 users happy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Araqiel
*Edit* Araq I have never seen people get instant chucked oow when caught.
He has no justification for his actions. He was bias towards STRIPPERS because of our actions towards his ghetto all age, plain and simple.Quote:
Originally Posted by Araqiel
what would've been fair was to not ****play allies and force known resetters to farm out to spite you
I didn't say roll the entire server back, just SWEA and PewpewQuote:
Originally Posted by American Badass
Speak to Peppie, or any FREEans. It happened.