<3 Syntico. You back?
Only semisuisidal ;)
Printable View
+1
ZZ actually collapsed in terror when Beauty came for them and instead of fighting back, farmed their land to Playboys in an attempt to get their allies #1. Playboys and Beauty both had a term cf and after both had full preps, Beauty then farmed Playboys for the crown.
Do I need to start a petition to get you to include TFC in your sig?
I've pushed it. I just know right where it is. I've brought the warning and allowed others to go beyond it and collect the ban. I'm actually not trying to glorify my behavior, I should actually be more respectful.
Thanks :)
How to never get banned:
1. Don't post something so obviously awful that you will get banned immediately
2. When the mods say stop, stop.
Poof, mystery unraveled lol
And +1 prestige to TFC
The most hilarious crown was the 10 province expendables and winning land/nw by the end of it.
My favorite crown was beating Dreams while they were trying to triple crown and ending their age.
BF & Pansies are easily the top 3 best kd's ever so their crowns definitely deserve to be the most valuable.
A recent selection is a Pulse/BB crown that resulted in them warring like the entire top and beating almost every top kd to crown, instead of the retarded gold for land meta, or ****play meta that's pretty common these days.
A perfect motorbike rider would never fall
Oh naw you didn't.
Everyone needs to let Age 50 go. The story constantly evolves every time I read it. At the end of the day, there's liability all around. If I were to apportion it, I would say I was responsible for 55% of it, Rage 25% of it, and other parties 20%. But you know what, I wouldn't change a damn thing. Age 44 to 45 was one of the highlights of my career.
Elit: It was my fault that the situation got out of hand in Age 50. Glad it worked out. One thing I want to say though, I think in all the versions of the stories I read, you've never pointed out that Versace also tipped you about Fratzia's malicious EoA motives. If the Rage hack hurt you, Fratzia's hack surely helped you. You can't have it both ways. Beyond that, Webmaster ****ed that up royally. His inexperience made him lose a sure win.
ASF: It was my fault that circumstances made you more active than you want in Age 46. I also want to point out, clarey was the one who made the public declaration. I was just an idler at that point, so I wasn't making any declarations. However, unlike CGG, I sincerely did not have the ability to tell Sonata to stop at that point. It's hard to explain, but I never lead Sonata with a true hierarchical structure. The kingdom was built on the premise of friendship and democratic rule. I think even during Age 44-45, I "led" in the sense I had ultimate veto powers for stupid things. But for what it's worth, Phlayre had the same veto powers. phiwha also had veto powers for things that would threaten his cowplay and so on. I never saw myself as "above" Phlayre, but circumstances basically worked out where I exercised my veto powers the most. I was a leader by "force" if you will. I guess I was pretty effective because Age 46 was basically bad decisions after bad decisions that culminated into the deal break.
I wish you guys knew more about Phlayre. I love the man, and his contributions to our peak success are way underrated. No one ever talks about him.
But that's about right. I think octo would gladly attest that since Age 33 (heretics), nothing happens in my kingdom without me "knowing about it". Wilful blindness still imputes knowledge. If there are any more questions about stuff, I'm happy to answer. But please, let it go everyone.
Btw, I'm shocked you hate me Korp. Wtf mate. Don't hate.
Not a single blade of grass on the field was free to move without Realest's express permission. He maintained an iron grip on our kingdom and all of yours as well (thanks to Versace).