so was consumer appreciation ...
Printable View
Bishop is awesome.
Because we are interested in the game developing.
Go go go go get those cheaters!
Dont get me wrong, i like how you kill the cheating. But i dont think Ryan did cheat or abuse anything here. Thus he should not have got deleted. Imo..
i agree with anri. i felt the same way too. i like what u are doing with the cheater bishop and i always support that. but i just feel that ryan is not cheating at all. and he shouldnt been deleted. im sorry if u feel that i am against u but i just think that ryan should not been deleted.
hmmm.. is there any possibility u can give ryan his account back? bishop?
Oh, how wonderful it would be if cheating was decide just from how people feel! ;D
I'm coining this term .. "ryan'd" .. =) for agreeing to a mutual war in term for the kingdom by the kingdoms
The moral of the story is don't leave a paper trail. Do diplo on irc/msn/etc. At that point, its just "strategy" that you dont choose to chain the biggie.
That, or learn to bait and troll, and make the enemy say things you want like "you guys are unreasonable, EoA War"
erm...^this at all of this thread.
To my understanding, acting a lone prov against the kd's wishes has not been actionable. If a prov want to make a deal with another prov I don't see the problem. You're just driving people away from using the in-game tools and once again giving irc kds the upperhand as far as backdoor deals go.
You say you want the game to develop and that's good, but how is two cows agreeing to a nap worse than a lone explorer killing off a whole established kd?