Can you explain why? Does arranged war = fake war? Or because your kd wanted to farm ED more and they made a choice to have a fair war so now its considered fake? Enlighten me, I am still learning.Quote:
Originally Posted by Elit
Printable View
Can you explain why? Does arranged war = fake war? Or because your kd wanted to farm ED more and they made a choice to have a fair war so now its considered fake? Enlighten me, I am still learning.Quote:
Originally Posted by Elit
After both kingdoms finished 1st wave( i think...)
** Summary **
Total attacks made: 37 (7,684 acres)
-- Traditional march: 30 (6,699 acres)
-- Ambush: 3 (346 acres)
-- Conquest: 3 (639 acres)
-- Failed: 1 (2.7% failure)
-- Uniques: 17
Total attacks suffered: 39 (6,503 acres)
-- Traditional march: 39 (6,503 acres)
-- Uniques: 17
Im sure you are smart enough to find all answers.Quote:
Originally Posted by SillyRabbit
Wauw, really insane chains... I see provs on 200nwpa... Really tough chains in this real war. Real NM/NS chains are mad..... I wonder how big eds cow is after this. My guess is huge and in good shape....
And yet when AMA does it, MrCurious is no where to be seen.. Curious.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrCurious
Did AMA fw? I dont think they did. Another fun fact: ED noticed right before going to "war", which means we can wave immidiately after war if we want. Would a kd entering a real war vs a active kd do that? I rest my caseQuote:
Originally Posted by Runefire
Maybe they did. It seems going to war with some huge unbreakable provinces on a particular side constitutes a fake war in your book.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrCurious
There is a difference between arranging a war and arranging a fake war, I would think someone from Jerks, a successful war kingdom, would know this. Would a kingdom notice another kingdom that they may want to war later on knowing they had a war arranged to start immediately? Probably.
That does not make the outcome predetermined by the leaders. And if outsiders predicting the likelihood of a war makes it fake, then AMA vs Pew Pew must have been fake.
so you agree there is something fishy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Runefire
I could not say. There could well be, fake wars have happened in the past. But all I know is if AMA does it, it is acceptable Utopia practice, if someone else does it, it is a fake war.Quote:
Originally Posted by padrez
Anyone can cry fake war. Still doesn't make it true.
Just grab some popcorn and watch the show.
The little boy was right. Eventually.Quote:
Originally Posted by rainbowsaurus
That's the excuse my grandma gives every time she picks her lotto numbers. Still hasn't won. :/
More crying. Seriously its embarrassing reading some of these posts when you realise the poster is 30+ years old.
I will take sot on ed cow on each few hrs to check its pezies, if it holds on pezies this means it is fake war, no kingdom will leave a 20k cow with pezies
Lol it is so funny how some people that play in neither ED nor Pewpew are soooo passionate about defending them. If it is not a fake war how you, as people out of the conflict are so sure it is not? Maybe cause u are simply always against AMA? :D Also none of you nice people said anything about the cruel AMA kd that didn't hit into war this time. Surely for a sin that has been promoted as a major turning point for all of you "neutrals" it is sad not to mention it. I love Korp and how despite having nothing to do with top fight he is always there to comment us. Simply that's cause he is a paragon of morals and ethics in this game. I see his reasoning in defending all that Pewpew, SWEA and ED do and talking against us. That a certain sign of real neutrality and rational thinking. :) Please do share some more of your great insights fellow.