Originally Posted by
Elldallan
Merriam-Webster defines to compete as follows: to strive consciously or unconsciously for an objective (such as position, profit, or a prize).
Oxford defines it as this: Strive to gain or win something by defeating or establishing superiority over others.
So if Bart is actively scheming to dethrone ASF from #1 then he is competing with ASF and thus in breach of the deal because he is striving for an objective that is prohibited by said deal
If Bart is actively trying to dethrone ASF by any means, then he is competing and thus in breach of the deal, aka dealbreaking and therefore GBing Bart is justified. Competing doesn't necessitate that you dethrone ASF first, you merely need to be and I paraphrase the dictionary here "consciously or unconsciously striving for an objective" and if that object is to dethrone ASF by any mean(it doesn't have to be in direct opposition, indirect will do) then Bart is dealbreaking, he doesn't need to have established dominance already.