Proposal to end he Awar

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sheister

You know, another way to view this is in this light:

Negotians arguably did not close, so it was OK to notice and hit in during negotiations. In that sense Emeriti is completely consistent with what happened to BB this age. So, the lesson is that when negotiating with emeriti, you should be hitting them WHILE you negotiate.

yupp....

---

The lesson is find Emeriti and GB, every age, until they disband.

Nah, its much more fun to pretend to be reasonable and dealing in good faith while actually not doing so because you don't send someone with authority to negotiate and then use that as an excuse to go afk and then ignore an ongoing negotiation....

That's pro.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 13nesta13

Nesta huge post on page39. Loggfile between Leshrak and Nesta, loggfile between Mithras and Nesta

---

Mithras:

I do suggest you read it.

I know the truth and you can spin lies in here all you want. I wont have a fancy trap like flogger to set you up. Everyone knows the truth, to bad you cant own up to it.

Almost as fun as having your allies fabricate a ton of rumors that are proven false to trick people into supporting your gangbang :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Palem

Almost as fun as having your allies fabricate a ton of rumors that are proven false to trick people into supporting your gangbang :D

---

Its only rumors until rumors is confirmed.
Now i am waiting for CP to release a logfile.
Until then, rumor.

Now we need Dorje also. He went under a rock or something?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Anri

Its only rumors until rumors is confirmed.
Now i am waiting for CP to release a logfile.
Until then, rumor.

---

I'm referring to this
http://forums.utopia-game.com/showth...-provided-gold

Anari, you retired. Please stay that way.

<3 Sanctuary

Palem,

Are you familiar with the idiom "the straw that broke the camel's back" ?
It seems like you're committing some kind of logical fallacy. Just because emeriti's or ABS players' previous actions might factor into people's involvement here, doesn't mean that it has nothing to do with this age...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Anri

Mithras:

I do suggest you read it.

I know the truth and you can spin lies in here all you want. I wont have a fancy trap like flogger to set you up. Everyone knows the truth, to bad you cant own up to it.

---

You do realise that the logs confirm my statements to the letter, right?

We had a 72h notice. Talks were ongoing but nothing confirmed. Pyro acknowledged and respected that, fully. What is it that you have a problem with?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tetley

Palem,

Are you familiar with the idiom "the straw that broke the camel's back" ?
It seems like you're committing some kind of logical fallacy. Just because emeriti's or ABS players' previous actions might factor into people's involvement here, doesn't mean that it has nothing to do with this age...

---

Where did I say it had nothing to do with this age?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Palem

Where did I say it had nothing to do with this age?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Palem

lol Anri, if you're going to condescend to someone I would suggest first making sure that the person isn't being sarcastic towards you. If the sarcasm wasn't clear by the giant Nic Cage meme, I'll make it more clear (all the following posts were posted in this exact thread, usually being argued against saying that Emeriti is getting gangbanged because of their actions this age)

---

Maybe this is just a semantics thing but, to me, arguing "against saying that Emeriti is getting gangbanged because of their actions this age" suggests that the point you are trying to make is that it had nothing to do with this age. Now if you had included the word "only" as in "saying that Emeriti is getting gangbanged ONLY because of their actions this age" then there would be no confusion.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Palem

Almost as fun as having your allies fabricate a ton of rumors that are proven false to trick people into supporting your gangbang :D

---

Proven? Where was their proof? The only proof they offered was "coincidence".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mithras

You do realise that the logs confirm my statements to the letter, right?

We had a 72h notice. Talks were ongoing but nothing confirmed. Pyro acknowledged and respected that, fully. What is it that you have a problem with?

---

It confirms Leshrak and Nesta having a mutual understanding then you coming online like a dishonest man to give a flat 72h notice to Pyro to dodge Simians. Why Pyro did not react harder, maybe they wanted the war and saw their chance, i dont know. The logg confirms exactly what we knew from the start. You are just to little of a man to admit you played us unfairly. ASF mentioned how you might not have treated Simians to fair last age, but thats to much for the rest to bare. So i will continue to work the anti-abs agenda for as long as it takes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Anri

It confirms Leshrak and Nesta having a mutual understanding then you coming online like a dishonest man to give a flat 72h notice to Pyro to dodge Simians. Why Pyro did not react harder, maybe they wanted the war and saw their chance, i dont know. The logg confirms exactly what we knew from the start. You are just to little of a man to admit you played us unfairly. ASF mentioned how you might not have treated Simians to fair last age, but thats to much for the rest to bare. So i will continue to work the anti-abs agenda for as long as it takes.

---

This mutual agreement, when did it expire and when was it agreed upon ingame?