? How so? I was just told they have unlimited access to both accounts with no restrictions. Tell me how there is no danger.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bishop
Printable View
? How so? I was just told they have unlimited access to both accounts with no restrictions. Tell me how there is no danger.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bishop
So what if they do? Its not a danger. Burden of proof is on you.
So how do we prove that a sat province is aiding a sitter? I would like to see that
Why would you need to prove that - that isn't abuse or an issue in the slightest.
It is worse than x-logging... It's handed-to-you x-logging. You cannot tell me that it isn't.
I agree with the attitude thread. :P
Sitting is FAR too easy to abuse.
Of course i can tell you its not xlogging. We define the terms. Sitting is sanctioned.
Abuse is not the right term either.
Oh sorry, it's not abuse. It's "sanctioned" cheating. It is the SAME thing. How can you not see a correlation with this?
Top K/D's at war can get their hyper active provinces to "SIT" for their less active provinces during a war. How is it NOT abusable?
If its allowed within the rules of the game its not cheating how hard can it be to understand that? I guess you dont use invites either or trades or anything similiar like that cause that would also be cheating then if we are using your logic. Top kds have more or less only active players so they dont need really anyone sitting them except for when they actually are on vacation or away for some reason.
it rly pisses me off how ppl equalize sitting with xlogging ... its not the same friggin thing ... ignoring the facts blindly just to make the argument doesnt make your point any more valid, just makes yoou looks redicolous.
With xlogging multiple people share login intel and log on for eachother, one province (all provinces beeing shared) can have any number of players which log into them thus ensuring 24/7 presence on line in case of emergency, they can abuse it to soliderblock, swap monarchy, kill dragons instantly, hide resources and do any number of sweet moves you can make with 25 ppl online.
With sitting you still have one guy playing that province and he can run 2 provs max in total, both of those provs's online presence is limited with his online time and cant be online 24/7 on call ...
Diference is obvious here ... so can we PLEASE stop using the rather moronic argument how xloging and sitting are the same thing ...
It's all about the rules. Unfortunately, even if the rules don't make sense, there's nothing we can do about it. Just gotta deal with it.
All the more reason to come down on this a bit as well. If a person is running more than one province at any time, neither province should be allowed to interact with each other nor should they be able to attack/op the same target. I never said sitting was wrong. Whitelisting was never wrong. Those who abuse them are. Simple.Quote:
Originally Posted by citadela01
So cheating isnt wrong. Cause you been claiming that sitting is cheating for awhile now..
i "sit" on a chair. do i look like a cheater?
whats wrong with all these people!
Exactly, because its paid for...that's what its all about. So basically what your saying here is...As long as you pay..you can sit a province and do ANYTHING. White listers are cheaters without proof and get screwed because we arent paying. You cant prove there is abuse on the white list either...you just ASSUME it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bishop
you could just not hit the same target - solved