zing!
Printable View
zing!
Proteus, this isn't the republican party... you can't just lie and hope that no one realizes
Godly you've never said a pro-Abs thing in your life so all of your troll posts are kinda bs and always ignored by anyone who takes this game seriously. Way to take out of context logs. Asf/I told you guys that if you tried to hit and hostile another kd while we were waving you we would still hit anyways. And even so that example isn't even valid here because Rage never hit anyone, we waited to fight the first kd who hit us. We let Bio and Fury decide which one of them gets to fight us. Obviously they chose both. Not having a cf with someone doesn't mean they can hit into your hostiles. Get a clue.
To be totally fair to abslogic, neither of these were hostiles. Did Rage have a hostile attitude pointed towards them at any point in this conflict? If not, then by same logic this is not a double hostile.
We all know what went down here.. Rage will bounce back though, ya'll fools just supplying Proteus more ammunition to talk smack in future rounds about ways and means.
This was way before hostilities started. There is nothing taken out of context.
Another fact is that you waved us that age, 7-8h after we waved Fury. Fury did a few ops, but did not do any diplo for CF. That was already a double hostile.
Another fact is that you noticed us after we noticed Fury and then you started that big mouth talk which I posted.
Funny how back then you do whatever you can to help Fury. You even wanted to hit BiO in their war with Fury. And now you're blackmouthing them whenever you can.
Specifics aren't relevant. What's relevant is the precedent it set.
Now, Personally, I disagree with this situation, just as I disagreed with Sanc's actions last age. In fact, I talked to some of my friends in abs about this last age and mentioned that they should not be surprised if their kds get doubled this age. The response I got is disproved by this incident. I was told I am too optimistic about the uto community and that no one will act on that situation. Also, I had forgotten about the situation prot mentioned above.
The reality of the situation is that One top kingdoms actions set a precedent for all other top kingdoms. This was made clear quite some time ago. This is why, for example, you must now include EoWCF in your notice agreements because EoWCF is not war. The fact that's avoided here is that a precedent is only useful when it benefits a kd. Not a single kingdom involved in this situation has the balls to step up and say that mistakes were made. Nor do they have the courage to set a new precedent for the future to avoid these situations. Instead, they all rather act on the existing ****hole they've been left from the warped loopholes set in the past. If they don't fix the precedent, then even **** situations like this are as equally legitimate as the next.
So much abs propaganda overnight!
Next thing they'll claim is a double hostile!
Okay now in office and read everything...
Abs politics sicken me but it also makes me delighted when I use it against them.
I still have a lot of Abs tricks up my sleeves.. accumulated from all the precedence that they have set over the ages.
Let me start taking them out one by one...
Upbeat Jazzo said Karma rage. Thats for interferring with our active hostile earlier in the age. Just when i thought Minions/Psych ward were your friend you sent to raze me. Will be interesting to see Minions/Psych ward tag themselves and reveal who they are.
This kingdom is currently at war with Rage vs Psych Ward and bio too (x:x)
Let the games begin!