<Burner> February 5 of YR12 SWEA (x:x) has declared WAR with our kingdom!
The plot thickens ....
Printable View
<Burner> February 5 of YR12 SWEA (x:x) has declared WAR with our kingdom!
The plot thickens ....
EoA NAP= End of Age Non Aggression Pact.
I know your english isn't the best elit, but is it the end of age yet? No
Did you make an act of gression toward Pew Pew? Yes
Did you or did you not break your EoA NAP before EoA?
Doesn't matter what the reason is, you deal broke. Plain and simple.
Odd ...
Maybe your English is not good? We made cf deal with kds in alliance not with pew pew. After pew pew left alliance with treat for gb us its clear cf deal gone so noting for break.Quote:
Originally Posted by jamin
you keep telling yourself that. it has worked so far.
So did your crownQuote:
Your nap gone moment when you left alliance
Quote:
Originally Posted by reQi
so why pew pew deal broke swea? Dont you just told its lame:P
I'll take a deal break against a weaker kingdom that is running from a stronger kingdom any day of the week. If Kingdom A dealbroke to hit you and run from Kingdom B, and you know you're going to get a ****load of acres from them, are you going to come on here crying that they dealbroke you? I don't think so. Justify it how you want elit. Dirtiest kingdom of the age goes to AMA. If you crown, I will piss on it.
This coming from the guy who harps on abs faults, irony. Now we know how low and dirty JSS likes to play!Quote:
Originally Posted by John Snowstorm
Seems like without abs all anyone does is set the bar lower and lower.
Hate to admit it but I agree with you. The only reason this is true though is because Abs would never hit each other. Less targets mean less chance for ****play, so by pure self loyalty this statement is true. Everything else about Abs is the same as what's happening right now.Quote:
Originally Posted by tak3shi
Ya you're pretty stupid if you hold a blind eye to that thinking it wasn't planned and agreed upon prior.Quote:
Originally Posted by Elit
You dont break EOA CF's for whatever reason its an EOA CF dont give it if you cant keep a cf. Thats ultra lame, you just went 1 step further than the dealbreakers this age! No wonder you're their Idol lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by Elit
Like I've always said nobody forces to u make deals, nobody forces you to make eoacf's if you cannot keep your word you're worth piss. There's no justification to this, you can out maneuver each other within the cf's you set but whose gonna trust you anymore if you cant keep simple cf's. Its not like u were going to lose the age anyway.
Abs dont dealbreak either. They may powerplay to force certain things but they dont dealbreak for the sake of a crown or they could have gb'ed their way to many crowns. There's still a pride of winning something legitimately without playing dirty.Quote:
Originally Posted by jamin
U idolized Elit, now I know why! because everything dirty that dealbreakers do he can 1 up it!
I'm fairly certain if the agreement was NAP modifier A.
A = some condtion
modifier = as long as, or while you dont, or while
So if the agreement was EoA NAP riding on X, and X went away, i dont see any deal break. I just see a bunch of QQ.
You can keep say w did dealbreak but its not true. CF was done with kds in alliance. Pew Pew left alliance and treat us with GB. Its clear moment when they acted this way CF gone too.
Pew Pew was trying to set gb on us if we war swea 1vs1. So we don't had other choice from hit pew pew. Now they DEAL BREAK swea for farm out.