-wSk- vs CR

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aranfein

Why isn't the other top KDs sorting this, either by force or mediating? setting a bad precedence and ****play like razing into war should not become the norm or the quick solution, its worst case scenario kind of thing.

If this had been any number of smaller KDs the top would already have taken action and sorted it by making sure the razing KD was greened or apologised on forum for being ****heads...

---

Why arent you? IF you want something you gotta do it yourself not hoping someone else will play for your agenda.

If i had a KD with provinces big enough i would Korp.. + I'm not leading, i believe its a KD decision and 1 that should be taken by a monarch, 1 rogue player in a ghetto will do no harm other then to own KD.

clear fw

we were seriously preparing for a b2b with CR, when CR pussy out and send CR to attack CRs. so confusing too many CRs

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by flogger

My comment to the "well we aren't even playing next age sentiment", usually that doesn't hold up since its one or two guys who don't want to play next age and 80% of the kingdom will end up doing so. Either:

1) If you're still playing the game now, you're fairly well addicted
2) Even if you do quit, you end up like a Realest who probably woulda come back at some point by now if he didn't know he had an impending ASF problem on his hands.


When you're a crowning kd, generally its a pretty bad decision to get into grudge matches over fights that don't mean anything (like this one). Hitting into this war is beyond stupid. Just apologize and move past it. You won the war, being mad enough at the person you just beat for talking to go into razekill mode is beyond retarded. If they're talking like they accomplished something, they did. Both sides shoulda ended that fight happy. One side getting the win, one side saving face in a loss.

If I were a CR player that actually cares about the top, now's about the time I'd start abandoning my province, since I imagine its just a couple irrational donks calling the shots. CR's reputation built the last 10 ages shouldn't be shat on because of a meaningless 2 vs 3 fight in which they won.

---

cr reputation fell apart the moment they let maximouse lead all down hill from there. I feel a name change coming on for this **** ghetto.

Anus) All kingdom reputations are salvageable through The Virtual Kingdom template.

Benus) Moderate a deal where 5 key players from each kingdom join together in a 5 divisional alignment.

Cenus) Forced to compete, forced to work together. Laugh and ask me if I'm serious, then get serious and make it reality. Drag your feet to the doom of proving your worth in the eyes of fellow kingdom mates who must also live up to a vaunted reputation of Badassism.

Denus) What are you doing next age, floundering in the shadow of Emeriti? Yes you are. Stop shaking your head. Baby.

Enus) Everybody made deals because they wanted to believe in something that wasn't true. The championship is lost. I'm not even going to be in it. Can you believe that? I'm just trying to help. You damn narcisisisisisisisissies.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aranfein

Why isn't the other top KDs sorting this, either by force or mediating? setting a bad precedence and ****play like razing into war should not become the norm or the quick solution, its worst case scenario kind of thing.

If this had been any number of smaller KDs the top would already have taken action and sorted it by making sure the razing KD was greened or apologised on forum for being ****heads...

---

Well if CR's claim of dealbreak is true then I feel that swift razes/gb should be the norm, every single time. On the other hand if that's baseless then yeah somebody should consider policing them.

I only want to see proof of that "deal". It will solve everything!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Palem

The insults need to go from the 10 that it's currently at to like a 2.

---

Why is your name not green anymore...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheRealBazinga

I only want to see proof of that "deal". It will solve everything!

---

That's true. From the forum thread(which isn't all that great of a credible source) even wsk admits that it exists, but they disagree on exactly when a war is lost. So yes the actual wording could be important but the existence of the deal seems to be beyond contestation as all parties involved agree that it exists. So going by that my conclusion would be that either
1. wsk dealbroke CR when they declared war on a third party before paying up.
2. The conflict is still ongoing and wsk screwed themselves royally by engaging with a third party while having a pre-existent conflict.

Either way it seems that wsk should never had declared Clash Royale and regardless of the narrative CR is justified to hit into that conflict, either to punish dealbreaking(laudable goal) or continue an ongoing conflict(somewhat douchebaggish, but still well within their rights).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aranfein

Why isn't the other top KDs sorting this, either by force or mediating? setting a bad precedence and ****play like razing into war should not become the norm or the quick solution, its worst case scenario kind of thing.

If this had been any number of smaller KDs the top would already have taken action and sorted it by making sure the razing KD was greened or apologised on forum for being ****heads...

---

The diplomatic door at CR is always open. There is willingness from our end to give wsk an EOACF.

Though given their inability to understand that war in game actually is war (not conflict) and withdraw is lose I am somewhat concerned about their interpretation of EOACF.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheRealBazinga

I only want to see proof of that "deal". It will solve everything!

---

I have seen the deal you are referring to (I think). The one where they fight for all or nothing to essentially give the winner a chance at emeriti.

So if thats what you are referring to, I assure you it was in place

The top isn't a "the" anymore it's an "a". No offense to large kingdoms that are size category: big. Who do you gather? The guys arguing and razing?

I will sort this out again for all new readers who can`t read all that spam.

1) Clash Royal gave 6k acres to CR
2) Just before our first war whit CR Clash Royal end blank CF whit us and stole bunch of gc from us. Instead they to be happy that we will kill their assfu...ers they try to screw us and help CR to win the war.... ????? they just gay and like to be f ... or Cr`s *****es?
3) We want that war so we gave CF to Clash Royal till yr10. yeah yeah not by utopia mail, only by whatsapp. But who give a ****. CF is CF
4) In our first war whit CR we added their acres to our banks and we WD.
5) All knew that there will be secound round between us. Clash Royal dealbreak ended our CF and waved us 6 hours after our war end.
6) So we had 2 choices war CR screwed and lose or war Clash Roylal. So we choosed second option like most kingdoms will choose
7) CR begin to raze us in our war even if they knew that this is not FW and keep razing even now
8) All top kingdoms act like this is normal

So it is all clear that top is full of pussies. But it is not clear why the game still allow these pussies to raze in other wars?

Diplo isn't as complex as one might think. We do it down here in action acronyms:

< April YR8 Edition May YR8 Edition
May 2 of YR8 Our dragon has set flight to ravage The Blues (them)!
May 3 of YR8 PINK BEER has sent an aid shipment to Domme Comet.
May 3 of YR8 We have proposed a ceasefire offer to The Blues (them).
May 4 of YR8 Rut (them) invaded Deep Mona (us) and captured 149 acres of land.