it was 3 kds and two single provinces on different locations to my knowledge.. giraffes(cr war name age), fs and somethingkd(dont know what they plan to call themselves at this point) were the kds.
Printable View
it was 3 kds and two single provinces on different locations to my knowledge.. giraffes(cr war name age), fs and somethingkd(dont know what they plan to call themselves at this point) were the kds.
I see. So were they protecting RealPandas? NotPandas? Are they one and the same?
I edited the text because i dont know what they want to call themselves but i do not understand your question.Quote:
Originally Posted by Panthira
not the same kds though, we (notpandas) is in my book calling ourselves 42 just for the time being, its not really agreed on though so me making this public will for sure make some people unhappy! We will decide on name some time later but for now the answer to the question of the name is 42. If people want to be finding me on irc im in the newest hippest channel #42 though ofc.
Pyrriha, Groovy, Bird Play, The Syndicate, Loverman Corp
I totally understand and agree that this has to happen.Quote:
Originally Posted by Loons
my problem was Elldallan demanding they force a kingdom (spartans in this case) to extend cf.
I would hope Spartans are fair and do this on their own. But I don't think Jesters should interfere in any of that. I mean where do you draw the line? Should the server just hand the crown to "42" just because this happened?
it happened, it sucked, life goes on.
The server should not hand nonpandas anything but the timing at which everything happened around the Jesters DB is quite strange to say the least. Jesters DB, Bart puts up banks and then doesn't want to extend CF? Every other KD that is competing, to my knowledge, has extended their CFs based on the DB except Bart. Jesters were on the front foot early in the forums (hell, they were the ones who created this very thread) about the DB and how nonpandas were being punished for bottomfeeding in ages past. Then Jesters openly admit it was a block and now offer a public apology about how they understand how wrong their actions were? Please.
Anyone would be naive to believe this is all a coincidence.
So Jesters said it intentionally blocked because Sparta asked them to? Unless you can prove that you are full of **** just like everyone else.
Didnt they even mention something like Dont let Emeriti win?Quote:
Originally Posted by maccar86
So Bart is two faced with Binar?
I am not quite sure where I mentioned Sparta specifically asking Jesters to block for them, just that Jesters admitted to blocking nonpandas because of their early lead. If my sources are correct, nonpandas have logs of this. I would happily stand corrected on this though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Osaze
This shouldn't matter though. Jesters got their punishment and that should mean they are free and clear. If indeed Spartan was in cahoots with them then Spartans should be punished not Jesters again. I know this isn't real life court but not being punished twice for the same act should apply here also.
War over, apology made, close this thread. Nothing but whining going on here.
When you say crap like "anyone would be naive to believe this is all a coincidence" when mentioning a leader of Sparta and talking about the timing of things, you seriously think ppl don't read between the lines of your insinuations?Quote:
Originally Posted by maccar86
Whining ...
Goodwitch, jesters can not help nonpandas to force a CF extension with Bart. Nonpandas just simply want jesters to stay out of interfering/blocking the top kingdoms for the rest of the age. Whatever happens nonpandas or '42'(only like 5 players agree on that name. But i think its an excellent name since im 42! which means I am the answer to everything hah!); is playing this game to top war and have fun in the processQuote:
Originally Posted by Goodwitch
I have no idea what was on Jesters, Spartans or nonpandas agendas. I just read the comments by people writing in here and draw my own conclusions. I then make assumptions and write them in a way that causes people to reply and hopefully we can draw a better conclusion as to what is actually going on here. Below is just a small sample of some of the comments in this thread that have led me to draw such conclusions. FYI I have never said anything I have stated is fact and true.
“Jesters got puppeted to db nonpandas and block for their competition.
So far half their KD is green. Meanwhile puppeteers are circling and waiting.”
“I've read the logs. Having said that, I see no benefit in making them public. This just fyi.”
“Now we wait, in 3 days puppeteer should crawl out in the open to vulture pandas.”
“Also the relative positions now compared to prior of said dealbreak is different, supposedly bart is salivating to vulture Pandas, are you willing to join others and force Spartans to extend cf in order to mitigate your dealbreak? That would probably go some ways to convince people that your word is worth more than jack ****.”
“ if you go back and read all of jesters reasons/excuses/flames towards nonpandas and the kingdoms that stepped into the conflict to solve it, and also see what they have posted in our war forums, on top of logs we have you would feel differently.”
“Especially since Jesters are supposedly Spartans lapdog and it is therefore reasonable to assume they did all of this to benefit Spartans if Spartans appear to benefit from the whole situation and are refusing to extend cf so Pandas can have a reasonable chance to prepare for a conflict with Spartans.”
“jesters on the other hand have been a bit more outspoken about their intentions and how they see their relation with sparta etc”
"Is it truth you asked for CF extension from Pandas and was denied one day before you friends Jesters decided to db and wave them with some weakass excuse ?"
"Just to confirm things, Bart asked for an extension 25th August, we refused it. Jerters dealbroke us 35 hours after that.
Coincidence I bet ? I will let you judge, Bart was the first kd we could notice."
"Sounds like Spartans was behind this?"
"I would say your cf with Pandas expired while Jesters were stalling
I would say you are not willing to extend Pandas cf"
"You dont undertand how people can think it look bad when jesters claim sparta is their allies, they db us a few days before we could possibly have noticed bart(which jesters said they thought we would), jesters told us in war they would wd when sparta was ready to take us on after the war and now that they do wd sparta dont want to extend."
I am sorry to any parties involved if I have unfairly judged them or insinuated things that are simply untrue.