Should Proteus pay KuhaN?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SillyRabbit

It works both ways, if Sanc won KuhaN would be here arguing about how Proteus wouldn't have paid had he lost.
If both betting parties were serious, they should have found an escrow to hold the funds. That wasn't done, the 'bet' is just for show.
Just my opinion...

---

SillyRabit obviously isnt much of a gambler either... dosnt matter if KuhaN woulda payed or not becuse he dosnt have to. If he woulda lost and refused to pay it would be him being blasted right now not protues but as things worked out proteus is on the hot seet. Basicly what Kuhan WOULD have done has no bearing on what kind of man protues is. one of the quickest way for a uni kid to get jacked up in real life is to go down to the local bar and start welching on bets with townies thinking his superior intelect will alow him to talk his way out of it. Law of the streets says pay da man or get F'ed UP.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by baka

KuhaN should've known better. He was betting with a guy who spouted all the crap in the forums about having 6 beers yada yada and then proceeded to delete it afterwards.

As if Proteus was going to pay... he probably can't even afford his lunch every day. Working as a janitor in an investment bank doesn't pay a heck load as prestige as the bank may be.

---

Weren't you the one who bragged on forums how you would vulture Rage after war with Fury/PW after you doubled us by hitting into hostile. After you saw us win you edited all your post, canceled dragon, and did not do a thing and sat quietly. We had to come and wave you ourselves. Both kingdoms started war at even land but somehow you ended 52% our NW range when you withdraw...care to comment how that happened or how you are a hypocrite for threatening to vulture and then deleting all posts after? Why are you asking us for cf extension if you are such a tough guy.

Better yet why do you lie about "not playing" in beastblood/pulse to me when you are there. Are you ashamed you lost all your wars this age?

01(15:34:13) 11(Proteus) lost 2x now
01(15:34:17) 11(Proteus) you are so bad, always losing
(15:34:26) 02(baka) excuse me?
01(15:34:41) 11(Proteus) i said you are bad as you always lose to everyone
(15:34:49) 02(baka) wtf are you even talking about
01(15:34:52) 11(Proteus) you've lost to all abs kds + pinkghetto
(15:34:54) 02(baka) I don't even play uto

02(&ata) [9:26pm] baka: our cf ends soon (i'm beastblood) with rage... we probably don't intend to war rage at all for the rest of the age so looking to extend cf etc.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Evillone

SillyRabit obviously isnt much of a gambler either... dosnt matter if KuhaN woulda payed or not becuse he dosnt have to. If he woulda lost and refused to pay it would be him being blasted right now not protues but as things worked out proteus is on the hot seet. Basicly what Kuhan WOULD have done has no bearing on what kind of man protues is. one of the quickest way for a uni kid to get jacked up in real life is to go down to the local bar and start welching on bets with townies thinking his superior intelect will alow him to talk his way out of it. Law of the streets says pay da man or get F'ed UP.

---

So you and other say its okay to GB/razekill people and police the server for matters that have nothing to do with diplomacy. I don't see people interfering when someone 2v1s, dealbreaks, gangbangs someone. Everyone just watches quietly. If that type of standard is applied would it be cool for us to dealbreak and razekill people when they did something I subjectively considered to be lame. Tread carefully...

objection. relevance?

I am going to allow it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Proteus

So you and other say its okay to GB/razekill people and police the server for matters that have nothing to do with diplomacy. I don't see people interfering when someone 2v1s, dealbreaks, gangbangs someone. Everyone just watches quietly. If that type of standard is applied would it be cool for us to dealbreak and razekill people when they did something I subjectively considered to be lame. Tread carefully...

---

Tread carefully? LMAO, i pay my debts, don't gotta worry about people coming after me for welching. Also quit trying to compare a REAL bet with REAL money to in game agreements about THE GAME. "Im not gonna pay my mortgage because my banker cheated when we played starcraft last weekend! FTW!" see how the two do not relate at all?

anyways i doubt my kingdom would waist any time on it and i have no say in the matter anyways so u can stop with the idle threats any time. I'm just voicing my opinion that i believe Kuhan and co would be justified and jacking you up something fierce (IRL would be preferable but if they can only get at you in game *shrugs*). If hes got friends that wanna help, well that's what friends are for.

Pay that mien his muounay!

I'm surprised anyone expected a different response coming from Proteus even so most of you are making a way bigger fuss than Kuhan has. Maybe most of you should have actually made a bet with Proteus so you actually have something to make a fuss about, no?

My good lord proteus give the guy $100, you made a bet and you lost.

People on these forums are idiots. If KuhaN was serious about making the bet and it being honored why didnt he find another neutral third party to hold the money in escrow? I have to side with Proteus here, I would not have paid a bet unless a neutral party had held the money, because there is nothing saying other person will pay or was even serious about taking the bet if they had not put their money on the table. Ever been to a casino and they let you bet without your money on the table? I think not, all the rest of this trolling and trash is just that, just a bunch of lames trying to find a reason to hate on Proteus and mess with Rage because of getting pwned by Rage. Get over it. Sheesh...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PhoenixScorpion

People on these forums are idiots. If KuhaN was serious about making the bet and it being honored why didnt he find another neutral third party to hold the money in escrow? I have to side with Proteus here, I would not have paid a bet unless a neutral party had held the money, because there is nothing saying other person will pay or was even serious about taking the bet if they had not put their money on the table. Ever been to a casino and they let you bet without your money on the table? I think not, all the rest of this trolling and trash is just that, just a bunch of lames trying to find a reason to hate on Proteus and mess with Rage because of getting pwned by Rage. Get over it. Sheesh...

---

j0 PS sup dude?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PhoenixScorpion

People on these forums are idiots. If KuhaN was serious about making the bet and it being honored why didnt he find another neutral third party to hold the money in escrow? I have to side with Proteus here, I would not have paid a bet unless a neutral party had held the money, because there is nothing saying other person will pay or was even serious about taking the bet if they had not put their money on the table. Ever been to a casino and they let you bet without your money on the table? I think not, all the rest of this trolling and trash is just that, just a bunch of lames trying to find a reason to hate on Proteus and mess with Rage because of getting pwned by Rage. Get over it. Sheesh...

---

In what alternate universe do you live in where you make a bet and need some neutral person to handle the money?

If you make a bet and welch you're a giant douche, Someone said I'll bet $100 and someone else agreed, its a damn bet. If you lose pay up. You don't need a contract and an escrow/title company in order to enact a bet.

You would think an internet lawyer with a great education would make enough money to send a 100 dollars after losing a bet. If 100 dollars is breaking the bank, it might time to reevaluate the return on your educational investment.

I also believe a bet is not a bet if money isn't placed. I'm always happy to RK Proteus though, just pass me the word :)

"Kuhan yes I am in." Nuff said