Printable View
In one hour after posting the above thing, I received six messages in-game, from kings and queens who are laughing at Sully's ghettoness.
Gee, I don't think anyone actually likes him anymore, and I don't think his kingdom will ever have another war again, either.
Rumors spread fast, and it's going to take them around 900 years to fix their kingdom.
That is very noobish from you VT. You both accepted the challenge, you didn't set time limits, so I'd expect that, who is in no shape to win that challenge would surrender. At this time you both can still win it, and to tell you the truth, I don't see you as the winner as the situation stands now, unless they play it very badly. It's not uncommon that good wars last for a week or two so yapping about "rest of the age" is a bit soon.Quote:
Originally Posted by VT2
On the "less worth of our time" that's another noobish thing. That was a public challenge for prooving one of you is better than the other, so it can't be about time, gains or anything.
The only thing that you can talk about, is if you won or lost the war at the end. I'll consider the war won or lost when one of the kingdoms will not be able to turn the tides. As things stand now, both still can win if they are able to play their cards well.
The fact that you talk about if it's worth or not your time, shows me that your kingdom is in deep problem, and you don't know how to say that you will surrender, so you started searching for noobie reasons for your loss.
That will make you look like Catwalk, with his famous "Strategical Withdraw" theory. I see that, in fact it's not much of a difference between you and him then.
Why? Because you didn't won in less time than your kingdom is determined enough to fight them? Well then, you lost and better withdraw, showing us that you're only the talk without the action, neither the ambition to carry out the action.Quote:
Originally Posted by VT2
Also, again... who are you to say they lost?
The fact that they don't talk to you is understandable, I wouldn't talk to you either until the end of the war. Talk is cheap. Now, let's see the action.
Sullys kd could easily win this now if they only choose right strat to follow...
Guess what, wofly? I didn't even care to read your post.
No, halfling - they can't.
There's now way for them to magically reverse the 5k acres they've given us to a gain for them, or take away the 250k networth we've grown, or take back the honor we've leeched from them.
I don't cheat, by your own definition. We haven't used account information for personal advantage, you specifically said that anyone who runs a multi without personal gain doesn't cheat, he merely breaks the rules.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweetiepie
Why do you presume to judge others and insist that your style of the playing is the only respectable one? You're rude and uninteresting.
That isn't my theory at all. I recall Ballers being hailed as winners after withdrawing from Brute Force with sizable gains (under the old system with both surrender and withdrawal). Claiming victory in a war where you lose acres and honour is silly. It may interest you to know that we haven't done any hit'n'run for quite some time now, as it's not an interesting way to play. But the rules currently favour it.Quote:
That will make you look like Catwalk, with his famous "Strategical Withdraw" theory. I see that, in fact it's not much of a difference between you and him then.
Because our style of play is the only one that's been legal for all these years, catty, unlike yours.
No, far from it. Playing as a team and requiring players to follow orders has been legal all along.
Vietnam won the war, but it cost them a lot.
Like a ghetto fighting someone good in this game, and the good kingdom deciding to withdraw.
They'd have gained a lot from it, but they'd not be the official winners, since the first person who withdraws loses.
me look at vt2 for next wave .... lol
bah too small
Im not in any of the 2 kingdom or has an grudges against any of them . I dont know how much of a noob VT is but im sure Sully is a pretty big one. Bragging about how he can destroy VT's kingdom before it even started. He was like what? 1.3 mil bigger then them? and after how many days of war he's in dragon range? or lost like 700k NW?
Please, true sully's kingdom can win , but because of what? Because he started out like 40% bigger then someone and decided to drag it out, not because he was superior strategticly or anything. Because he was purely bigger. They shouldnt even have to turn the tide when he was the one issue the challenging, mouthing off way before hand, had the size advantage.
If he didnt think he lost, sully would be here mouthing off a long time ago. Him keeping silence does not mean he all of a sudden just decide not to talk. Its because he's humiliated.
Either way , whoever WD, VT won.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WolfDGrey
Lol, I don't believe that, you wouldn't be VT. It's just that you don't have reply, because you know I'm right. You wouldn't give an answer like that, if you woudn't have read it.Quote:
Originally Posted by VT2
Aye! That was noobish from Sully...Quote:
Originally Posted by Ced
That doesn't matter. Since VT accepted the challenge, nothing like size, NW, war readyness, pumpedness or how many acres was taken in the first X days matters. None of that, neither any other thing, except only one: who destroys/owns/murders/rapes the other completely?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ced
When one of them will not be able to fight back, the winner will be seen.
That might be true, all depends on Sully's character.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ced
That's just a big LOL. He will only truly win (and that is true for Sully's Kd too) if the others are obliterated.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ced
its still possible. we've done it many times. sometimes its intentional to trick ppl into thinking they are winning and loot honor until they realize (i dont think this is the case here), and a few other times its due to mistakes we made earlier and we make up for them later in warQuote:
Originally Posted by VT2
nobody can deny that VT2 is WINNING, but he hasnt won yet, and sully's kingdom is by no means crushed. yes the rate they are weakening is far faster than VT2's kd, but because of the huge nw advantage they started out with they still have some fight left. in fact if u ONLY look at the situation now, their kd is in far better position than VT2's with several unbreakable provs and far superior nwpa on same land (they had that since the beginning of war). the only thing stopping them from winning is their own stupidity. and as unlikely as it is for them to suddenly get smart, that possibility should not be counted out
a friendly advice to VT2 is to keep ur head cool and still take this thing seriously. also dont **** talk too much because its not time to celebrate just yet. sully made the mistake of **** talking too early and got silenced, while VT2 is right along track of the same route
This is at least entertaining to keep track of while I'm collecting bonuses.
we should broad cast every war VT2 has so entertaining