You have proof of that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sig
Printable View
You have proof of that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sig
The entire community knows, and that is good enough for me.
Hey Bishop...if you havnt been droppin the ban hammer hardly at all anymore....and you are not biased...can I ask why you banned a Stripper for sympathizing with you today?
Good thing you aren't game support then i guess, we require proof.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sig
The man was being compassionate and feeling your pain of having to deal with all the QQ in the forums. We laughed at him for getting banned when he was being a commie pinko sympathizer.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghetto_King
I believe THAT is the very definition of BIAS. I could be wrong tho...I am not privy to your Lexicon of The Bishop Language
http://forums.utopia-game.com/showth...1#post15257227Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve420
Steve420 - do not post in this thread again.
Oh ok, you had proof for 1 win, what about the other 7 you deleted from us? Where was your proof for those? How come those were deleted then if you require 100% factual proof for each case??Quote:
Originally Posted by Bishop
Proof you were win trading was what was required for all war wins to be reset, as happened to all other kingdoms in the same circumstances.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sig
but sir! i only copied one question.. why fail my entire test??
Every one include you know they cheated. If you cant find prof mean you have bad tools for use.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bishop
less qq people. please? thanks!
elit is still mad he got outplayed I see, what else is new
Im not feel outplayed.Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ NA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elit
I'm actually not gunna troll elit here, he is right. Bishop is bias and does not give a damn.Quote:
Originally Posted by Elit
considering your **** play led to that outcome, you should feel outplayed
Well damn, Sig and Steve just made this interesting.
So Debauchery got stripped of their war wins for doing exactly the same as SWEA*, but SWEA don't get punished?
* A kingdom gives away the button to war and intentionally farms out to them.
Bishop seriously, where is the consistency in these admin decisions?
He has no consistency and is extremely bias in his decision-making. He removed 8 wins when only 1 had proof of cheating. We would have won the crown with 7 wins still, but due to the fact that we had robbed his KD earlier in the age (Thundercats, with Dharan and Octo; they were uber butt-hurt over the stealing and even joined Ezzerlands ghetto in RKing us later) he reset all our wins to 0.
SWEA has a FW-farm out/intentionally for putting SWEA in a huge lead, and wins the biggest crown, but gets nothing in terms of punishment.
Imagine a game of soccer when the ref is on one of the teams. Sounds like a fun league... do you want to play in it?
Making deals to get a warwin isnt exactly the same thing as farming a kingdom.
Okey, provide proof that SWEA did cheat then if its that easy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Elit
It would have been a WW with or without the deal. The only deal was no black-ops (Prop/AW). That is a weak attempt Korp, even you can do better than that.
The entire server knows what happened, and why.
It wasn't legit farming, they put up no fight whatsoever. It was a fake war farm out - the dev's declared it so. That says it all really.Quote:
Originally Posted by Korp
Nothing can change now, what is done is done, but we need some actual rules and punishments for this type of behaviour. It ruins entire ages for kingdoms, then makes players question why they bothered in the first place.
Yeah pretty much. But apparently Bishop doesn't agree? Look at all his posts in response to mine..lol. If ours was a FW for a WW, what was that war? And why did we get 8 wins removed when it was only 1 win which was deemed fake? And SWEA gets to landcrown+no punishment.Quote:
Originally Posted by Araqiel
All I got from Bishop was that I need to look up the term 'bias'
Well, I did..
bi?as [ b əss ]
preference: an unfair preference for or dislike of something
Bishop dislikes us because of the robbing we did towards Thundercats all age, the KD which he was PLAYING IN. That is why we got such severe punishment over 1 FW. Nuff said.
Cheaters always proclaim that they are innocent, strange eh?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sig
There isnt anything as a illegal farmout, since farming isnt against the rules. Bishop (as the devs dont meddle in the business of mere mortals) decided that what Pewpew was against the rules, that is abusing mechanics in the game when they suicided and ran into a war.Quote:
Originally Posted by Araqiel
You clearly haven't read ****. We admitted we cheated for the 1 war. Unlike you nubs, who wont admit. Go back to your trollcave.Quote:
Originally Posted by Korp
Cause we didnt cheat, see? Why would anyone admit something they didnt do?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sig
Would you care to explain how SWEA farming a kingdom that gives them free acres is any different to Debauchery doing it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Korp
AMA played most clean and fair all age last age. Almost all big kds used friends all last age for land-drop them.Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ NA
Debauchery, made bad move with broke deal with Rage. After it ABS GB turned to disaster for ABS and result from it they farmed rage/hoh. SWEA and Pew Pew decide to take on easy land and vultured Debauchery. AMA stayed away from it. We gave them notice after Simians messed it all with declare war SWEA.
Last age: Simians/Pew Pew farmed for free Havoc when they decide to landrop. 30k for Simians and 9k for Pew Pew. AMA got zero acres.
Last age Pew Pew land grow is from: 1 WW vs sanc. After it AMA/BB gave them protection with keep Havoc busy. Its result they Got CF and its gave them chance for Set cows. After it they did standard ghetto bash+landrop frends+farm for free havoc and grow alot. Its make them think about "win" and decide to play AMA and Debauchery for get second war with them. During first war Pew Pew didn't hit on propose Debauchery cow. Deal was to let it stay big and they raze after war SWEA. When both kds drop his CF and set another war 10 minutes before our CF expire its was clear they have another shady deal based to provs intel. This put AMA in loss/loss choice. Result 2 kds try cheat us with lame play. We did what was correct and waved Debauchery. Hope they learned his lesson and wont end triked again from Pew Pew or other kd to be farm in war. Because Pew Pew plan didn't worked they become crazy and start act more stupid. Its resulted all next ****s.
AMA had won his n1 till KDs around us start pull ****s. You cant stay clean when all around you pulls ****s.
You just weren't caught. Big difference. Logs of what was going to happen were via IRC, instead of the noob monarch we faced who sent an in-game msg of no black ops. I wonder if you are conscious of your lies, or have you actually convinced yourself that you played legit?
It really doesn't matter tho, the entire community knows what happened and why, like I said.
so let me get this right, you "notice" strippers and you feel that they have to war you, but when they decide to fight someone more their size, you get mad and hit into war and feel this isn't **** play, correct me if I'm wrong
I don't care for Mansoor at all. Problem is you are playing nonsense game on words and try defend all this cheating. I had a lot better opinion for you before.Quote:
Originally Posted by Korp
If both kds didn't had any deal, choice war them is full legit and normal. When both kds had CF deal and was very clear Stripers have 0% chances in this incoming war+ Silva and Petrified are very close its smell smell...Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ NA
Notices deals is not for let you choice where to farm out before it end. Its for prepare to fight or look for set new deal.
Would you explain what Debauchery did?Quote:
Originally Posted by Araqiel
Warred a kingdom that didn't fight back for their own personal advantage (get a warwin to win the war win chart).Quote:
Originally Posted by Korp
This is all he is good at.Quote:
Originally Posted by Elit
OH, an blatant lies.
We didnt need the win to win WW chart, we would have won with 7, we got 8 from them tho.Quote:
Originally Posted by Araqiel
Also, they fought back, we just agreed to not black-op (prop/AW).
No they didnt, read the thread :/Quote:
Originally Posted by Araqiel
No it wasn't, its already been admitted here. The deal was win trading.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sig
Yes, a win for not black opping, that was established.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bishop
You are still super bias in your decision making due to PLAYING IN A KINGDOM THAT WE ROBBED.
You should either quit doing what your doing, or quit playing. You shouldn't be allowed to do both, because this is exactly what happens when a ref is also a player on a team.
HENCE BIAS <- did i use it right again?
This comes from a cheating dealbreaking person, its quite rich :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Sig
So, how is that the same thing?Quote:
Originally Posted by Araqiel
And you're not biased playing the kd that cheated? oh lawl :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Sig
Elit - I had a much higher opinion about you before last age as well. Last age just showed that you dont care for anything else than personal gains, if you can get away with a ****ty move you will do it and then try to justify it with b****ting.
And you're not biased playing the kd that cheated? oh lawl :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Sig
Elit - I had a much higher opinion about you before last age as well. Last age just showed that you dont care for anything else than personal gains, if you can get away with a ****ty move you will do it and then try to justify it with b****ting.