In this case, yes it was. They stole $100 and paid a $50 fine. The province's that got deleted were immediately replaced and dumped pool within hours.
Printable View
It's pillz, his insults are a sign of endearment, like a peck on the cheek.
I hate all of your avatars. But the change makes me imagine mickster as a swiftfag and that's amusing.
Anyways, there is no logic in removing kds from rankings anyways. Cheating and 'cheating' and **** play all just stem from a interest in the game....zauper and hawk probably being the text book examples.
Obviously punishment is necessary but I figure full reset ala pewpew? is more effective than deleting or removing from rankings.
And that in the most extreme cases. Kicked out of eowcf seems appropriate here.
Clear FW.
They got to #1 via fake warring, they get punished and back at #1 within a couple of days, only a little less #1 (fewer acres than they otherwise would have had). It do seem like a very mild form of punishment for fake warring. Granted its early age and being #1 now with empty pool is probably more of a disadvantage than anything. But yea, I can sympathise with those feeling the punishment was quite mild. I hear their explore pool bonus from the WW remained intact (rumour?), perhaps that should have been removed along with all other WW bonuses? Or a rollback to pre-war state...
What would be a fitting punishment then?
Removal from eoa rankings like Sparta was for doing the same thing
Does it matter if zulu knew? If 24 provinces conspired to do something without the monarchs knowledge, you would still punish the kd.
What's the threshold in your opinion for how many need to know? because based on deletions alone at least 20% were in on it (and I'm certain nathz was aware as well, though wasn't deleted).