Printable View
Expand the third Party API so that one can more easily create build calculators that work website side and attack calculators / auto filing of values. Munk seems to have an advantage here because he apparently has access to a special api only he can use; lets fix this so everyone can have access here.
Userscripts.Quote:
Originally Posted by khronosschoty
Those don't work everywhere without in game API support.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pillz
Munk was just a Userscript before the apis afaik?Quote:
Originally Posted by khronosschoty
Maybe, but does not change the fact that without in game API support you can't have webui tweaks that work everywhere.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pillz
Yet he did? Am I missing something?Quote:
Originally Posted by khronosschoty
Why do you think he moved over to in game API? lol
For which features? Because I'm pretty sure it's cause he became a developer for the game..?Quote:
Originally Posted by khronosschoty
I'm not aware of any new features to munkbot since he integrated it. In game wise that is.
Auto fills, spell & army displays, etc, were all there in the original Userscripts. Also angelus' extension had them too iirc? I don't recall the name.
Stuff like kd page graphs were possible with scrapping, until the target api came out which is open to all.
now the autofill stuff works more places then it did before it went to in game api.
The 'advantage' that munk has is that you can set his userscript to load regardless of where you login from, instead of having to load it from your browser.
Probably would not give the same rights to other developers, as MUGA can't be responsible for their code not having malicious elements.
All the ingame function does is load his userscript.
Told you so
And that allows his userscript to be used more places than would otherwise be able to be.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zauper
This is basically going to kill, or extremely curb, third party involvement if it won't or can't be fixed.
The "malicious elements" argument you made is pretty close to total nonsense. You just need to know how to code right ;p; and maybe add a warning about using third party API.
Nope, there is no location that his userscript can be used now that it could not previously.Quote:
Originally Posted by khronosschoty
Disagree. We've seen folks continuing to develop as third parties.Quote:
This is basically going to kill, or extremely curb, third party involvement if it won't or can't be fixed.
The "malicious elements" argument you made is pretty close to total nonsense. You just need to know how to code right ;p; and maybe add a warning about using third party API.
If there is a third party developer that wants to build webui changes and not use a userscript on the client side to load via greasemonkey or loading the js natively on phones, they should contact utopiasupport.
This is 100% not true.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zauper
Yes, your still see third party support but your totally killing my interest and other peoples interest. While killing my interest is not so bad, its the other peoples interest your killing that is bad.
;p good luck.
Name one.Quote:
Originally Posted by khronosschoty