Does hitting someone in prosperous reduce elite conversion for undead?
I just hit a 93%/106% ranged province with 0 GBP with 2500 specs and a few elites. Got a lousy 96 converted.
Printable View
Does hitting someone in prosperous reduce elite conversion for undead?
I just hit a 93%/106% ranged province with 0 GBP with 2500 specs and a few elites. Got a lousy 96 converted.
I should add that the target was in prosperous not my kd.
yes ive noticed this too. appears hitting into prosperous stance has significantly reduced conversions. not sure if its a bug or an undocumented change.Quote:
Originally Posted by titefuzz
i did one hit prosp to prosp and got 1% conversion. was a 98% NW / 96% land size all troops home never hit all month target. it was a WTF moment.
normal-normal converts are good, but yeah unless the conversion is super RANDOM there is something that is making the converts FAR LESS??
----something i haven't checked was to see if the KD size was in range, however im pretty sure this early a few 1000's nw off isn't a make or break issue.----??
it is bugged, stay away from hits into prosperpus kds
Or we could get the bug fixed lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Over
so the land gains are ok but the conversions are low?
is this fixed?
i dont think they are looking at this because there is no reply from them.Quote:
Originally Posted by ahtoad
I think if there was a thread on this in bug forums, it might catch their attention better than in this thread.
There is. No response from devs/admin.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shrinky
Hmm, odd of them. I can see there is another thread related to Destroy Ritual spell not being available which has also not been responded to by the Devs :\Quote:
Originally Posted by Selephant
It does mitigate gains yes, they confirmed that its not a bug, it appears its the only reduction they kept in tact from the old "Fort" stance. We have seen up to 200% reduced conversions hitting into prosp on average.
Response from the Bug thread on this, is that it is not a Bug apparently, because instead of just admitting that there was an oversight and it would be fixed next age, it is somehow better to say it was a poor design choice to argue that "No Gains Penalty" actually means No Gains Penalty, except for 1/3 of the server or 60% of attackers getting conversions.
I would have a lot more respect if acknowledgement was made that it was overlooked and would be fixed next age with an apology, instead of winging it as you go that everything was by design.