Originally Posted by
Tadpole
Of course there needs to be ways to attain WW crown without also crowning for land. But beating the whore kingdoms in war is in fact beating some of the best warring kds. If WW points are to reflect how good you are at warring (and not something else, like how good you are at baiting nubs), land chart has to be a factor.
There needs to be a balance ofc. If a whore kingdom win ww crown by baiting a ghetto OOP, and farming a whore kingdom or two from superior position, the formula needs reworking. But if you beat Emeriti, BB, WSK and Sleepy on your way to crown - those 4 wins are surely a better reflection of your warring skills than pretending to be a nub kd, baiting 8 kingdoms and winning in the lower t. 100.
If you enjoy the war-tiering meta of land dropping, nw manipulation, staying intentionally small, ghetto baiting etc. Then this change is bad of course. The aim of it is not to grant whoring kingdoms triple crowns - but to ensure that evenly matched kingdoms war eachother, and to encouraging taking on hard opponents.