Looks like the US elections are over now
Printable View
Looks like the US elections are over now
Nah. Trump lost basically nothing as far as getting votes. His supporters are aware that he's disrespectful to women. They either support his misogynistic views or they just flat out don't care
Can we seriously fast-forward to 2020? Or rewind to 2014..?
Clinton needed something to distract from Wikileaks. CTR is on overdrive.
If the election is over, it's been over for a while now. This doesn't change anything substantial... people vote ultimately on what serves their bottom line, not a personality contest.
As a European, it's like watching a train derail. I'm torn between being horrified and grabbing popcorn.
As an American, I get to choose between two monsters who will undoubtedly drag the world into a nightmare. I'm torn between running to the hills and just shotgunning myself now.
So it's ok to kill babies using abortion but we draw the line at grabbing a woman in the p***y. No i doubt it changes the election. I haven't even got into the fact Bill Clinton rapes women and Hillary helps cover it up.
And here i thought it was just another smear tactic from one of HRC's 'media buddies'.
I'm confused. If Trump has done nothing wrong what did Bill do wrong?
I don't recall any 13 year olds accusing Bill of raping them...¯\_(ツ)_/¯
If you're talking about the Epstein thing, Bill Clinton and Trump both are involved in that disgusting business. We really don't have a choice this cycle.
This is just Trump saying some mean words. If calling Mexicans rapists didn't faze people, this shouldn't.
The GOP withdrawing support was just a matter of time. They're not going to go down with the Trump ship, but they had to wait until the final stretch for their withdrawal of support to do maximum damage. I don't think the GOP wants to win this cycle, because they know whoever wins in 2016 inherits a ****storm of a country. Better for them to let Clinton win, who has promised to run the country on neocon principles anyway, and have her take the blame when **** hits the fan.
I'll repeat - Clinton and her bought-and-paid-for MSM just need something to distract from wikileaks. They may cover the airwaves, but the internet is far more interested in her campaign leaks. Unfortunately the few undecided voters left are the really low-info ones, the ones who are going to vote for the last person who told them what to do.
Europeans must understand that through some strange twist of actually idiocy or conspiracy we can now stand in line and vote for something that doesn't matter. Don't be smug, you'll be lowering wages soon yourselves. We have an election where staying home might be more patriotic than voting. Luckily I voted Stein last election so my armor is clean. I'm not a communist by the way and have voted libertarian in the past. I'm savvy enough to understand a bias representative in the White House will be balanced due to political attrition.
My conspiracy projections see a move toward a military government. You see, I get use to observing happenstance news and entertainment interlocking as media tightens its grip. That doesn't make me a republican, so hold on. It's when the thing about people not standing for the national anthem became a thing. The test shot was groups of veterans saying they didn't object because it is their choice and the choice they fought for. Now, that's pretty cozy and addresses several complaints. In other words, while I deem this to be true it's the fact that it has media traction that makes me suspicious.
The US has operated on a lot of false friction and suddenly we have balance from the veteran perspective. I know a lot of veterans and I know this voice is true, but it's not been publicized. My point is that it's not the grunts that would be in charge. It's the machine that has invoked refugee populations on our first world neighbors.
Trump(and Clinton) are perfectly terrible enough to give cause to formulaic paradigm: a third option. 99 out of 100 conspiracy theories can be wrong. We can't afford to sleep on the real ones.
If your curious about who's running the country just watch a 60 Minutes episode about raising political dollars. You don't need to watch it to figure out 'not these people'.
311 million people in the USA and these are the ONLY 2 choices, one of which will run the basics of the free world for 4-8 years.
There are many men with some shred of deceny in their capacity for thought hypocritical or not, whom would not behave in such a manner ( no not even in private ). What trump said or say shouldnt be surprising to anyone, most would have figured out it probably would not matter as his supporters are fueled more on anti government sentiments than their love for his persona.
This is mainly blown out of propotion by the coporate sponsored media to further some sort of agenda and the actors are all dancing to the cue to the interlude like this is even something new in the first place.
At this point it shouldn't be a surprise, and people voting for him already would have been like "Yeah I could see him saying that", and nothing changes. As noobium stated, just a clever deflection from having to discuss the wikileaks at length.
The hilarious thing about this grab the pussy **** is that everyone knows DC political elites engage in this sort of behavior all of the time. Power is the greatest aphrodesiac, as Hillary Clinton's mentor said.
Seriously? It's America and all men speak like this in private with their friends. Lol. Democrats are the biggest hypocrites in the world. Last I checked Democrats have no problem with a doctor reaching into a woman's womb through her p*say. Pulling out a defenseless baby using a pick to destroy it's brain. Then harvesting organs and stent cells. To turn around and sell them for a profit. But it's the end of the world if a rich guy says woman will let him touch them down there. Hence it being consensual and not predatory or illegal. Hypocrisy is crazy and I bet if he was Gay talking about touching a man you would still have a problem with it? You do realize the woman must have liked his advances or there would have been a lawsuit. Kinda like the woman who Bill Clinton paid 800k to because he sexually assaulted her.
Gotta get one thing through your head... NO ONE is going to outlaw abortion. Republicans and Democrats both want population control.
I stand corrected but you can't harvest organs from an undeveloped fetus. Its not profitable that way, just a disgusting procedure, not going into details. Plus lawsuits don't really work the way it is ideally described to in the real life, people would rather avoid going to court to avoid the humilation of a trial and attorney fees of going through one. Only rarely in a high profile case can you expect some sort of remueration.
Hopefully you would notice that most of us? Are not democrats, and if that is how you perceive your people behave then in a way, you deserve trump to represent your country as leadership of your government. You live with the consequences anyway.
All ya'all should've voted Ron Paul when you had the chance!
Again, deflecting and again most men don't speak about sexually assaulting women.
I've literally never had a conversation with another man that has gone into the direction of forcing ones self onto a woman without her consent. There's a pretty large and important difference between talking sexually about women and bragging about grabbing and kissing women with impunity.
So please stop categorizing me as a sexual predator just because you have a poor understanding of reality and you assume that everyone else is as misguided as yourself
You and the rest of the news media need to look up what sexual assault means then. He was famous so the woman enjoyed it and allowed him to do it. That is consent and there for not sexual assault. Lol. Your a big fan of Taylor Swift right if she walked up and grabbed your stuff would you consider it sexual assault?
Lolol without his consent, he can sue her if he has the monies.
Edit: he is talking abt the specific woman being someone who wouldnt mind btw, i have seen plenty of trump trolls purpertuating the story over at youtube. Then again you =/= me or anyone else, strange to assume everyone else have to take the moral lowbar and accept that behaviour as faultless. Lololol.
If being famous is consent to touch anyone then Bill Clinton did nothing wrong. You can't say that rich famous men are allowed to do whatever they want to women and also say that Bill Clinton sexually abused women.
But all that's getting side tracked from the fact that your ideas on consent, women, and basic social behavior are so out of wack that I'm done with this conversation other than than to advise you to stay the hell away from women and I can only hope that you don't have any children to teach your messed up views on women to.
If you don't grab them by their genitals, how do you get their attention?
Too bad that honesty and decency don't win anymore. Evil is taking over, everywhere.
Wikileaks is on a rampage with Podesta emails. Looks like they have enough ammunition to release new docs daily until November 8.
Assange, you're a ****ing magnificent bastard.
Nah, just liberal media bull****
(And I don't think you meant to close this so I'm opening it back)
I didn't, thanks.
(Hate mobile.)I can't believe some ppl think this is normal for men.
http://i.imgur.com/cUC11BO.jpg