I just said i want a Vineless thread.
Not worried about TPA as i should have around 9.5-10 modded with all the multipliers.
thanks
I just said i want a Vineless thread.
Not worried about TPA as i should have around 9.5-10 modded with all the multipliers.
thanks
Just don't have over a combined rawtpa and rawwpa of 9. Because you will need to have a really strong military power.
greenie the strategy this guy is trying to pull off is not an average strategy. What works for common strategies will not work for this strategy. I need much higher numbers in everything the thing is finding the balance between them all.
you are pretty amazing Vine because you really make people respond to you , which i stated before i do not want to. anyhow
The issue is not about my military, because obviously i can pump a pretty good offense/defense. The main question is my NWPA. Should i keep it down and just achieve a better BE to get more modifiers or just draft like i normal do , and keep a 83-85% BE and turn the extra into military but have a much higher NWPA.
hoping ppl who war good kingdoms and have been in many of these situations where there's a high province with a high NWPA and pro's and cons.
I guess it depends on your style. I usually play with low draft-rate, low nwpa, with better economy. It works fine with humans/dwarves (as economy is one of their strengths).
With and elf/orc i`d rather overdraft and hit a lot, and occasionally do plunders to sustain the economy.
Well when running high nwpa everything needs to be running at tip-top shape try to figure a way to keep a minimum of 100%. I'm only going to say one thing and this will be last post here. You're BE is way too low as a human you can get over 130% BE if played correctly. I'm say it one more time if you are going to run high nwpa then everything needs to be running at tip top shape. Over and out.
No, you can't get over 130% BE anymore with 99% draft, because science was changed.
Stop spreading your lies all over the place, vines.
Catwalk's crusade for legalized cheating was a stunning success, with ghettos and low-tiered teams everywhere losing their wells of knowledge to better kingdoms in the process.
Step one: replace everything that works.
Step two: blame the predictable epic fail on outside forces.
Step three: keep the community informed that no progress has been made since the last update.
Step four: thank you for your patience.
there's a reason i dont want you to reply here Vines. I dont make up fantasy numbers.
Please stop replying.
7 dspecs per acre is fine. If your time-frame allows for more military, build more elites, cuz specs are easy to replenish later on.
On the net worth question since no one seems to get it, high net worth per see means nothing. It's offensive points per net worth and defensive points per net worth. Usually this can be done using a high amount of military buildings and fewer econ buildings. It also helps to use a combo of elites and horse mounted off specs rather than all elite. Cheaper, too. With 1:1 and above ratios for elite def spec, you get good turtle ability, some semi-suicide attack ability, but not much for net worth efficiency.
Dolgil Rosethorn
If it's broke, fix it.
If it's not, don't.
If you do not like the results, change your methods.
Quit making the same old mistakes. Make new ones.
ced there not fantasy numbers.
Yes, vines, they are.
Catwalk's crusade for legalized cheating was a stunning success, with ghettos and low-tiered teams everywhere losing their wells of knowledge to better kingdoms in the process.
Step one: replace everything that works.
Step two: blame the predictable epic fail on outside forces.
Step three: keep the community informed that no progress has been made since the last update.
Step four: thank you for your patience.
vines is able to turn fantasy into reality. That's how good he is. You all should be learning from him.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)