Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 25 of 25

Thread: Attack Time

  1. #16
    Sir Postalot
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    3,036
    Quote Originally Posted by VT2 View Post
    THE GAME DOES NOT LET YOU GET MORE FROM PERCENTAGE-BASED BUILDINGS THAN 25 TIMES THE LISTED AMOUNT!
    silly VT2, of course you can, as long as your prov is named "Red Mist" =)

  2. #17
    Postaholic clarey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Perth/Singapore
    Posts
    959
    Quote Originally Posted by vines View Post
    One can have around 43% lower attack time from barracks. The max affect is not 37.5% that is wrong.
    As quoted from the guide

    Percentage-based Buildings - The majority of Utopian buildings are percentage-based. These buildings provide an effect based on the portion of your land covered by it. For example, having 10% of your land as Banks will increase your income by a certain percentage. Like flat-rate buildings, these also require employees to provide full effects. In addition, each additional building you construct will be less effective. The numbers listed below would be for the first building you construct. Your Internal Affairs Advisor will help you to understand the benefits of your land. Unless otherwise specified, these buildings have a maximum effect of 25 times the number listed below. With normal building efficiency, this maximum is reached by dedicating 50% of your land to that building.

    Training Grounds
    Increase Offensive Military Efficiency by % * 1.5
    Normal math
    1.5*25= 37.5% max effects from barracks

    vines math
    1.5*25 = some imaginary number.

    Please RTFG.

  3. #18
    Whoo! Woo! 100
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    100
    Vines you are confusing an angel bug that fortified stance adds 15% attack speed. And with the same bug aggressive stand lowers attack speed by 10% making your max 33.75. This is an angel bug vines.

    Please RTFMFM.

  4. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by VT2 View Post
    Vines, it's mathematically proven that 1.5x25=37.5.
    The 37.5 would be 37.5% lowered attack-times from dedicating 50% of your land, running 100% BE, to barracks.

    If you have 200% BE, 25% barracks will give you 37.5% lower attack-times, but running more than 25% barracks won't do a thing, because THE GAME DOES NOT LET YOU GET MORE FROM PERCENTAGE-BASED BUILDINGS THAN 25 TIMES THE LISTED AMOUNT!
    Actually, 200% BE does not mean you run half the buildings. Less.

  5. #20
    Sir Postalot
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    3,036
    Quote Originally Posted by puppy101 View Post
    Normal math
    1.5*25= 37.5% max effects from barracks

    vines math
    1.5*25 = some imaginary number.

    Please RTFG.
    silly puppy, you must learn the ways of vines
    1.5*25 =/= "some imaginary number."

    1.5*25 = 2 rolls of a 10 sided dice (yes, they do exist!) put together in whatever order you choose, followed by going to this site, and adding this number as the decimal point =)

    THATS vines maths =)

  6. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,377
    What I'm saying is out of war the max for barracks is not 37.5% and my claim is backed up by the game. The formula you used may have been correct once upon a time but that formula is not the case for this age.

  7. #22
    Needs to get out more VT2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    10,880
    Vines, go die.
    Catwalk's crusade for legalized cheating was a stunning success, with ghettos and low-tiered teams everywhere losing their wells of knowledge to better kingdoms in the process.

    Step one: replace everything that works.
    Step two: blame the predictable epic fail on outside forces.
    Step three: keep the community informed that no progress has been made since the last update.
    Step four: thank you for your patience.

  8. #23
    Veteran Someone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    661
    proove it vines. And not throught angel.

    Edit: Seems like i missed the 2'nd page...
    Last edited by Someone; 12-09-2008 at 14:21.

  9. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    14
    nice to see my thread destroyed by trollings, thanks vines.

  10. #25
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    222
    hey greenie, i got 14!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •