There has been a rather large amount of Controversy over the actions and decisions (or lack their of) from OMAC these recent weeks. Many Kingdoms have received deletions with nearly as many that have been re-instated. Discussions ensued about the appearing random nature of the deletions, and even stranger re-instations.
In response to the controversy, OMAC has publicly posted that a new system is being considered in regards to actions against the different variations of cheating. They act on a case by case basis ONLY on reported material and, given a varying degree of consideration, decide on a respective coarse of action.
Currently, OMAC continues responding, deleting a multitude of players and acting in contradiction to the current rules and posts of which they explain their recent actions. Such contradictions include:
- Deleting Legitimate Provinces
:: What degree of consideration leads to the deletion of perhaps the ONLY legit/non-traded/non-x-logged prov in a kingdom?
- Sustaining Deletions of Some traded provinces while Re-instating others
:: Granting "fresh" accounts for some traded players (such as troll hammerman) while leaving others (such as X) to sustain their deletions.
- Stating that rule violations result in action, while not acting on violations they have acknowledged.
:: Violation for obscenities result in deletion, whereas violation of dismissing account information for the purpose of player trading is... not violating rules?
At what point can a line be drawn? At what time can OMAC release a new guideline to which they can enforce? Will OMAC continue in their current coarse, without rules they can point to as a fail-safe fall back?
And most importantly, IF OMAC addresses this thread, will they only reply to a small fragment while avoiding the actual issue?