Your first post made some faulty claims about GB protection and such (virtually non existent in war), I corrected you a bit on that and then said that I didn't think that the suggested strategy would result in a kill. As I understood your second post you were continuing the argument from the first post, if that wasn't so I don't really understand the meaning of the post when I in the post you were replying to clearly said that I didn't think that the strategy would give a PK.