Oh god! Not you too!
maybe its stupid, maybe its not... it works for us to have 3 pure T/Ms in our kd. (we have really active players as T/Ms that have played them for ages and do a great job off it (so its not like we have semi inactives playing wastefull province slots as T/Ms that never do anything, theres huge expectations on them in wars or their turned to attackers/hybrids).
3 t/m to 22 hybrid/attack mix works for us.
and I dont think kds that make use of a few of them are nessarly noobs or bad kds.
For every T/M you have another Hybrid can play heavy attacker.
In ghettos, this means an attacker who gets raped by ops.
In competent KD this means an attacker who can break T/Ms, bottomfeeders, Turtles, etc in war.
trust me, its better to not have pure T/Ms. My kd runs hybrids only and we have made it in the top 20 of every chart we go after for the last 5 ages save for age 38 where we ended in the top 30 nw and honor.
It is not must have to use hybrids. 21 pure attackers + 4 T/M's could work very well also.
no it isnt. It is more scary if you throw a few DEs there too. Gnome warriors cannot MS.must say tho, war against 25 gnome warrior/rogues is quite scary
How did you lose a set of ops exactly? The T/M performs twice as many ops as the hybrid does. The heavy attacker does both the t and m intel ops the hybrid would have done with his weakest role (m for an A/T).
You might be down 1 attack a day but the attacks will be more important. A heavy attacker can hit a lot higher and harder into the enemy than a hybrid can because he has another 3 or 4 elites per acre. That can be a 30% increase in offence.
Like T/Ms, Heavy attackers uses are limited so you dont need loads of them, just enough to balance out your T/Ms, then the rest go hybrid.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)