I'm stuck between both, comments?
I'm stuck between both, comments?
DE all the way XD
DE attacker isnt very yummy imo.. youll have an easier time gn/art, especially since you cant decide for yourself :o
Between those 2, gnome artisan wins.
i honestly wouldnt pick either of those...
Both are subpar.
Catwalk's crusade for legalized cheating was a stunning success, with ghettos and low-tiered teams everywhere losing their wells of knowledge to better kingdoms in the process.
Step one: replace everything that works.
Step two: blame the predictable epic fail on outside forces.
Step three: keep the community informed that no progress has been made since the last update.
Step four: thank you for your patience.
What are good then?
Thanks Greenie, people saying this race combo is crap or that's no good are just generalizing, depends on how your gonna use them.
If your good enough, you can make just about any race/combo work for ya.
How good/bad would a Gnome be with the war hero personality?
gnomes problems isnt the economy, its the unit losses and drafttimes/retraining times and how you ll lose military faster than you can retrain it and you ll wear down within 2-3days of wars.
if you pick gnome go /rogue and make use of propagandas to offset some of those losses/retrianing times. (run high TDs (20-30%) and you ll be fine as a Gnome/Rogue)
The problem with Gnomes is that they die in droves and as such cannot sustain long periods of constant attacking.
Gnomes are not heavy attachers they are not built for that they are built to the thieves that can attack.
If you want to be a heavy attacker go human, dwarf or Elf.
In the end a war hero is not bad but it does not make the best use of the races strength. Rogue is the best match up to get the extra stealth to thieve. Warrior is also good because gnomes can be as quick as elves leaving you vulnerable for less time when attacking.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)