Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 54

Thread: That's a fine T/M.

  1. #31
    Post Fiend Iovan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    122
    Waah wah wah. Dark Elf isn't ruined by this. It is just now more even with other races. If it turns out terrible you will find out and it can be changed next age. I have a feeling that it won't ruin them.

  2. #32
    I like to post Catwalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Århus, Denmark
    Posts
    3,806
    Toadi, do you still maintain that elf is unplayable?
    For Master of Magic fans:

    Quote Originally Posted by Dylan Collins, CEO of OMAC
    You should ask as many people as you can to criticise what you plan on doing.

  3. #33
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    164
    I'm playing Elf/Rogue in Gen and It is kicking butt. With -50% losses, -50% Wages, all the def spells on magic and clear sight for theivery they make them the ultimate hybrid.
    +1 mana reg and +1 stealth reg and access to a ton of ops/spells is hard to beat.
    The World is out there. We are stuck inside Here.

  4. #34
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    163
    Quote Originally Posted by Toadi View Post
    Dark Elves were far from overpowered - I warred a bunch this age - and their main strength comes from the combination of increased stealth regeneration and free magic. Addressing these is a much smarter choice if you want to weaken the Dark Elves, their offense is not the problem and their army is already hindered by the defensive elite.

    The suggested change pretty much kills the only true A/M in this game and limits it to a subpar T/M role.
    but the +1 stealth and free magic (esp. ToG) is what makes DE interesting.

    We lost a war to a bunch of DE rogues this age - primarily because our Ms didn't use Expose thieves enough. If we had ETed enough, we still may have lost because of their ToG ability in the long run if not countered. Had we played better we would have won - that fine line is what makes Utopia a good game. DE as it is now exemplifies this.

  5. #35
    Post Demon Ishandra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,591
    Or you could have just double massacred each of them hatter, since DE has pitiful defence if they have a usable offence.

    By the time they ToG back their thieves, with a low income from massacres, you should have chained down a few of them into oblivion.

  6. #36
    Needs to get out more VT2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    10,880
    Dark elf is heavily overrated, and Sully's kingdom proved it better than I ever could.

    Ezzer doesn't seem to have had that great a success running mostly dark elves, either.
    Catwalk's crusade for legalized cheating was a stunning success, with ghettos and low-tiered teams everywhere losing their wells of knowledge to better kingdoms in the process.

    Step one: replace everything that works.
    Step two: blame the predictable epic fail on outside forces.
    Step three: keep the community informed that no progress has been made since the last update.
    Step four: thank you for your patience.

  7. #37
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    England
    Posts
    491
    What decent DE ToGs in war? I'm DE this age and I run high draft so ToG is practically useless -- and surely a few MS on the opponents is better?

    I don't like this change from 6/0 to 5/0. Made my mind up. Maybe hurt them elsewhere, I don't know, +15% military expenses? Someone else might have a better idea.

  8. #38
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    164
    Well if they just want to make a Dark Elf T/M only then mission accomplished. But by giving it the Orc they havent really helped the Orc too much but they have certainly hurt the Dark Elf quite a bit.
    The World is out there. We are stuck inside Here.

  9. #39
    Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    66
    THey helped the orc only in the respect that orc can make offense specs with credits during war and by doing so they will have a pretty good offense through out the war. THey just need to watch their defense to make sure they dont slip up on it.

  10. #40
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    163
    Quote Originally Posted by Ishandra View Post
    Or you could have just double massacred each of them hatter, since DE has pitiful defence if they have a usable offence..
    yep, that was exactly what was asked for (!!), but perhaps not strongly enough.

    Dilbert, with DE Rogue A/T, spare mana seems to be used for income first (via ToG and highish guild %) and then offense ops if income isn't needed. Makes for an interesting war race.

    But... overall they do need a boost with the suggested prelim changes. Maybe minus 25% resource loses might be the way to go (it would make them much more interesting, to me anyway). That would make for excellent as TM and a sleeper attacker race. It would also encourage more aggressive TM strats (using lower defense)

  11. #41
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    England
    Posts
    491
    I'm DE Mystic, and not used ToG once in war. How can you have spare mana in war anyway?

  12. #42
    Needs to get out more VT2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    10,880
    Adding natural reduction to resource- and land-losses to a T/M race is stupid.

    It's comparable to making gnome immune or resistant to fireballs.
    Catwalk's crusade for legalized cheating was a stunning success, with ghettos and low-tiered teams everywhere losing their wells of knowledge to better kingdoms in the process.

    Step one: replace everything that works.
    Step two: blame the predictable epic fail on outside forces.
    Step three: keep the community informed that no progress has been made since the last update.
    Step four: thank you for your patience.

  13. #43
    Post Demon Ishandra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,591
    Just put the elite to 6/6 for 1k GC 7 NW.

    Lower the Magic damage to 10-20% Bonus at most.

  14. #44
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    163
    Quote Originally Posted by VT2 View Post
    Adding natural reduction to resource- and land-losses to a T/M race is stupid.

    It's comparable to making gnome immune or resistant to fireballs.
    It helps TMs + encourages them to risk lower defence (as massacres will be less effective).

    It also makes DE hybrids more resistant in the pre-war period, and allows them to be more aggressive when sending offense.

  15. #45
    Needs to get out more VT2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    10,880
    Helping T/M is good, because...?

    What hybrid are you speaking of here? 5/6, with it all coming from suicidal, dead-expensive, networth-inefficient elites, does not make for good A.

    The only realistic hybrid we'll see dark elf as is T/M.
    Catwalk's crusade for legalized cheating was a stunning success, with ghettos and low-tiered teams everywhere losing their wells of knowledge to better kingdoms in the process.

    Step one: replace everything that works.
    Step two: blame the predictable epic fail on outside forces.
    Step three: keep the community informed that no progress has been made since the last update.
    Step four: thank you for your patience.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •