Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 95

Thread: LoL @ Abs terms of surrender of CoV

  1. 04-03-2009, 16:09 #1
    DevilsAdvocate
    DevilsAdvocate is offline
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    9

    LoL @ Abs terms of surrender of CoV

    I wonder how much KDs will keep to these terms after EoA

    *******************
    *****************************************
    1) Immediate Conditions of Surrender
    a) Agreement to immediately cease all attacks, spells, thievery ops, dragons, or any other hostilities against the Absalom kingdoms and allies involved in the war.
    b) Agreement to immediately change kingdom name to say "WE SURRENDER" and fly banner designated by Absalom for a minimum of 72hours.
    c) Withdraw from any current wars with Absalom or kingdoms providing assistance to Absalom at minimum time unless a later date is agreed to by the opposing kingdom.
    d) Ingame CF any Absalom kingdom or kingdom providing assistance to Absalom immediately upon their requesting it and maintain a 2 week CF (whether declared ingame or not) with all involved.
    2) Long Term Pact
    a) Agreement not to take part in any retributary attack against any Absalom kingdom or kingdom providing assistance to Absalom during the war.
    b) Agreement not to use friendly or intentional GBP to leverage up, start, feed, or otherwise aid or assist in a bank or bank-killing province for perpetuity.
    c) Agreement to never take part in any coordinated multiple kingdom attacks (including involvement in any future alliance wars) on Absalom kingdoms for perpetuity.
    d) Agreement to never use, ally with, coordinate with, or intentionally benefit from the use of multies or shell kingdoms.
    e) Agreement that any public comments regarding the alliance war, its initiation, or its resolution should not be made in a negative way about Absalom kingdom or kingdom providing assistance to Absalom, in this or future ages.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 04-03-2009, 16:13 #2
    Raywre
    Raywre is offline
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    148
    lol
    Kaer Loche Alliance
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 04-03-2009, 16:13 #3
    VT2
    VT2 is offline
    Needs to get out more VT2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    10,880
    Sounds pretty ghetto to me.
    Catwalk's crusade for legalized cheating was a stunning success, with ghettos and low-tiered teams everywhere losing their wells of knowledge to better kingdoms in the process.

    Step one: replace everything that works.
    Step two: blame the predictable epic fail on outside forces.
    Step three: keep the community informed that no progress has been made since the last update.
    Step four: thank you for your patience.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 04-03-2009, 16:24 #4
    Palem
    Palem is offline
    Moderator for:
    Utopia Forums
     Palem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    22,030
    Quote Originally Posted by DevilsAdvocate View Post
    d) Agreement to never use, ally with, coordinate with, or intentionally benefit from the use of multies or shell kingdoms.
    COV could NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER keep this one...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 04-03-2009, 16:26 #5
    Raywre
    Raywre is offline
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    148
    like abs ....
    Kaer Loche Alliance
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 04-03-2009, 16:27 #6
    DevilsAdvocate
    DevilsAdvocate is offline
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by Palem View Post
    COV could NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER keep this one...
    Cov disbanded I believe. Neither can Abs hold itself to these terms. Or did Abs just deleted their shells from mergers?

    Anyway these terms are ridiculous.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 04-03-2009, 16:33 #7
    clarey
    clarey is offline
    Postaholic clarey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Perth/Singapore
    Posts
    959
    ummm if cov disbanded... so technically these terms are moot, should we say?
    Utopian 5 Sept 2005 - 5 Sept 2013
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 04-03-2009, 17:20 #8
    MorbidAngel
    MorbidAngel is offline
    I like to post MorbidAngel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Serbia // Sinners
    Posts
    3,839
    Send a message via ICQ to MorbidAngel Send a message via AIM to MorbidAngel Send a message via MSN to MorbidAngel Send a message via Yahoo to MorbidAngel Send a message via Skype™ to MorbidAngel
    lol
    OLDSCHOOL

    Inferno of Absalom
    The Gay
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 04-03-2009, 17:26 #9
    DHaran
    DHaran is offline
    Needs to get out more DHaran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    8,402
    ROFL what a bright spot in my day
    S E C R E T S
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 04-03-2009, 18:27 #10
    Realest
    Realest is offline
    I like to post Realest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    4,368
    the victor of wars always get to dictate history. the gayest part of this whole is how badly rage farmed for war wins.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 04-03-2009, 18:36 #11
    Godfather
    Godfather is offline
    Regular Godfather's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    97
    yeah those damn ragers!

    Shakes fist!

    Shakes fist again, but faster!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 04-03-2009, 18:48 #12
    complacent
    complacent is offline
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    141
    Kick the enemy while he's down. That makes perfect sense.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 04-03-2009, 19:30 #13
    Alien
    Alien is offline
    Member Alien's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    19
    Send a message via MSN to Alien
    good stuff I tell ya.
    Last edited by Alien; 04-03-2009 at 19:42.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 04-03-2009, 20:37 #14
    Osiris
    Osiris is offline
    Enthusiast Osiris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    349
    Quote Originally Posted by DevilsAdvocate View Post
    e) Agreement that any public comments regarding the alliance war, its initiation, or its resolution should not be made in a negative way about Absalom kingdom or kingdom providing assistance to Absalom, in this or future ages.
    I like this one :P

    Overall I don't get what the fuss is about. Withdrawals and NAPs are normal terms after alliance wars. The other terms are mostly just about fair play...
    You see, there's two kinds of people in this world, my friend. Those with loaded guns... and those who dig.
    You dig.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 04-03-2009, 22:29 #15
    stoffi
    stoffi is offline
    Forum Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    1,232
    Send a message via MSN to stoffi
    Quote Originally Posted by DevilsAdvocate View Post
    I wonder how much KDs will keep to these terms after EoA

    *******************
    *****************************************
    1) Immediate Conditions of Surrender
    a) Agreement to immediately cease all attacks, spells, thievery ops, dragons, or any other hostilities against the Absalom kingdoms and allies involved in the war.
    b) Agreement to immediately change kingdom name to say "WE SURRENDER" and fly banner designated by Absalom for a minimum of 72hours.
    c) Withdraw from any current wars with Absalom or kingdoms providing assistance to Absalom at minimum time unless a later date is agreed to by the opposing kingdom.
    d) Ingame CF any Absalom kingdom or kingdom providing assistance to Absalom immediately upon their requesting it and maintain a 2 week CF (whether declared ingame or not) with all involved.
    2) Long Term Pact
    a) Agreement not to take part in any retributary attack against any Absalom kingdom or kingdom providing assistance to Absalom during the war.
    b) Agreement not to use friendly or intentional GBP to leverage up, start, feed, or otherwise aid or assist in a bank or bank-killing province for perpetuity.
    c) Agreement to never take part in any coordinated multiple kingdom attacks (including involvement in any future alliance wars) on Absalom kingdoms for perpetuity.
    d) Agreement to never use, ally with, coordinate with, or intentionally benefit from the use of multies or shell kingdoms.
    e) Agreement that any public comments regarding the alliance war, its initiation, or its resolution should not be made in a negative way about Absalom kingdom or kingdom providing assistance to Absalom, in this or future ages.


    1 a,b,c and d are to expected, and quite normal. 2a is okay for this age, but long term? :)

    2b is just silly. Using friends to get gb prot is quite normal, and last time I played, abs used this tactic alot, along with other non-abs kds ofc. So in this, Absalom demands to have all banks for all future ages, since they obviously are allowed to get gb prot by friends? :) Funny.

    I see 2b, c, d and e as jokes. A new age is a new age, simple as that. And not cooperate with shell kds? So only abs is allowed to do that now? Last time I played, abs used moonshine(or whatever it was) shell actively in the killer/bank race, and god knows how many other shells.


    In conclusion, this is a surrender no man on earth would give into, and if they give into it, there is a 100% guarantee that it will be broken next age, or even this age.

    So why make an impossible surrender treaty?
    ABS vs Rangers

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules