This was brought up when trading was legalized, subject to certain restrictions. Opponents of legal trading would argue that it'd be difficult to make kingdoms respect the legal rules.
Let's say a kingdom is formed in a single round through illegal trading, on basis of a shell. 25 players join the kingdom and set about playing. Let's further say they go and win the land crown or something. Do you consider this foul play, and do you consider them unworthy of the crown?
For Master of Magic fans:
Originally Posted by Dylan Collins, CEO of OMAC
yes
Obviously yes.
Hell for a second I thought you was talking about Sonata ;)
"Mike Hawk Owns U"
u break the rules u cheat. whats so hard to understand there?
Catwalk i dont thinks its foul play if your going to allow tradeing you should allow it as a whole makeing restrictions only herts the weaker players
what i mean is "eather everyone can trade into any kd they want or no one should beable to trade into any kd"
Multi on the otherhand extream foulplay
and if you would have asked this before tradeing was legalised i woulda agreed with everyone else and said yes its foul play but the way its setup now it benifits the stronger kds alot more then it benifits others for
#1 who wants to trade into a ghetto LOL
#2 full kds dont have to use trade codes since there full jest an acaision replacement
#3 moderate kd's cant get "good" recruites normally recruites unless they played with them in the past meaning its not a getto or moderate kd its a "copycat SK' jest remade again
first round back since tradeing was legalised so i dont know the exact rules on it eather
No. I can imagine omac might have a problem with the lost revenue but I don't see why anyone else would care about that
mero mero, I agree completely that it's cheating. Cheating is clearly defined by the rules. Would you consider any accomplishments made by employing illegal trading unmerited?
For Master of Magic fans:
Bonesplitter, the restrictions generally don't apply to weaker players. For the most part, they have plenty codes to handle any recruiting they're capable of doing. The restrictions are mainly intended for a scenario such as the one above, forming a new top kingdom overnight. Is it fair to have restrictions for that kind of scenario, or should people be allowed to do so freely?
For Master of Magic fans:
i dont see 5 codes a round being plenty expesially when your a ghetto so 3 of the codes used to trade in would probubly end up defecting back out or useing another kds code to move up the latter
and yes i think a SK should beable to spring up overnight it jest makes for more compitition for the rest of the SK This game has way to manny situations witch benifit the stronger players more then the Inexperienced "none of witch make the game unplayable or harder for the inexperienced" jest more benifits for the others keeping the inexperienced in the stone age for twice aslong before finding there own SK
how is the trading done to create this kingdom any different than how previous crown winners won it?
The End of an Era
im pretty sure thats what the reference is. lol
interesting to bring up catwalk :)
Crimson, I'd never dare accuse the mighty and honourable Realest of any such thing. And I was actually mainly interested in the general topic. Do people feel that the achievements of a kingdom that pops up overnight are worthy?
But since he's here, was Sonata formed via illegal trading Realest?
For Master of Magic fans:
did we get deleted?
The End of an Era
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote