Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: suggestion

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    14

    suggestion

    in order for them* to decide what is the problem...

    why they do not open the game, and let`s say let only 100 players temporary login to see if the game crash or not...

    of course in the freeze mode :)

    regards

  2. #2
    Forum Addict Krozair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,018
    cause 1000 players would still try :)
    Laughter IS the best medicine - always

  3. #3
    Regular
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    56
    Sell the game to someone who can make the game playable..

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    14
    there are ways to limit to first 100 users only

  5. #5
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    127
    Plz dont post in blue no one can read it.

    Btw who would you pick to be the 100. Cause heck i want in.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    14
    random first 100... this is not important at the moment, in order for them to understand if the high amount of users trying to access in the same time the server is the problem!

  7. #7
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    127
    Sorry cant have random 100 as there is no guarantee those 100 will be available. You could get 20 of them on.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    37
    but you prolly could limit the total amount of users to 100, making WHOEVER logs in first among the 100, then the rest would be rejected... meh what do i know, im an idiot :/

  9. #9
    Veteran DeVille's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    596

    Exclamation Old server would be sweet!

    Download everyone back to the server we were using when Jolt took over - it worked fine - b4 they put their 2 shiny new servers in.

    Let us play in peace & let S & B get 100 volunteers to test Beta again at their leisure.
    Shaken not stirred.

  10. #10
    I like to post KuhaN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    tracy, california
    Posts
    4,732
    Quote Originally Posted by nongratA View Post
    random first 100... this is not important at the moment, in order for them to understand if the high amount of users trying to access in the same time the server is the problem!
    obviously it's the ****ing problem.
    "Go back to the gym because you f'king suck at utopia, noob." -Godly



    My classic black theme for Utopia - Updated 5/13/15

    Quote Originally Posted by darkl1ght View Post
    Unfortunately, no amount of razes will improve your war record
    Greatest strategy thread/question of all-time.

  11. #11
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    241
    Masters of the obvious :) -obviously

  12. #12
    Post Demon Spliff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,923
    +1 for support of the game


    only problem is everyone would complain as soon as they see 2000 acre province attack them.

  13. #13
    Member Kaunista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    46
    Have separate servers for login and the actual game.
    Make a que system for the login that shows your place in que, opening up a new tab/window or refreshing the page makes you loose your place in the que.
    Players in game will timeout after like 20 mins.
    Change the way provinces are updated so they dont get updated each tick but instead gets updated as soon as someone is accessing said province. (player logs in, another player op the province)

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    23
    Yeah. They could always use a queue system for testing purposes I guess. But then again, the problem ain't freeze mode, the problem is with updating their SQL records and related to that: ticking. Thus the code is flawed. If it can't handle 10k record updates (with or without scripters) it's not gonna make a difference to let a 100 people in freeze mode because their will be no updating the records.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    23
    Oh...to correct myself: it's not only code but could be database or server related. However, that seems very unlikely.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •