undead sage?

[Titan25]

Would an undead sage be a decent idea? Seeing as sage eliminates the sci for the undead and add 5%.... Haven't played in 2 years because it got so overwhelming so now i will be back to play daily 1 to 3 log ins with Attacker maybe half through the age throw in some A/M Ud sage... im sure 2 massive attacks a day maybe 1 to start with... Just curious if anyone thought of undead sage

[Yadda9To5]

100 - 20% = 80; 80 + 25% = 100. No 5% added :/

My view on these kinds of logic comes down to: strengthen your strengths and accept your weaknesses. At the same time science is pretty huge for a hybrid (boost wpa).

[Titan25]

100 - 20% = 80; 80 + 25% = 100. No 5% added :/

My view on these kinds of logic comes down to: strengthen your strengths and accept your weaknesses. At the same time science is pretty huge for a hybrid (boost wpa).

20% = 80;

80 + 25% = 100.??????
No 5% added :/


80 + 25% = 105% :-)

i think when i was in school 80 plus 25 equaled 105 not 100

Undead
* Offense doesn't die on attacks you make
* Successful land attacks convert specialists to elites *
* Spreads and is immune to The Plague
* No Food required

* -20% science effectiveness*****


* Access to basic thievery only


The Sage
* + 25% science effectiveness******


* - 30% Book Costs
* -30% Learn Time
* -50% Losses on Learn Attacks
* Every 4 Acres of land produces 1 Science Book per Hour

[Hooah]

everything multplies

so 1 * .8 * 1.25 = 1

http://wiki.utopia-game.com/index.php/Science_Formulas

[Freeway]

80 * 1.25 = 100

lol

edit: Hooah was faster (i am watching tv)

[Hooah]

yada knows what he is talking, just explaining it poorly.....

[Titan25]

original thoughts what do you think on the undead sage idea?

[Yadda9To5]

yada knows what he is talking, just explaining it poorly.....

Yeah, and I even took great care not to write 100% - 20% = 80% + 25% = 100% :p

Still 5% or 0% doesn't matter much in the grand scheme of all things Utopia. I myself would never be undead mage unless you're in a kd with 15+ undeads, the two ways to handle them in war are to let them grow (rune cost goes up, wpa down) or simply chain them (and then you have to choose between your wizzies or elites).

[Freeway]

yada knows what he is talking, just explaining it poorly.....

Yeah he multiplied to get the 100, but made a mistake to write a plus sign. The "lol" was laughing at the fact that he got the answer right with poor explanation.

[Ordray]

If I were going to go hybrid UD next age, then I'd go UD/Rogue. It's much easier to raise mTPA than mWPA since you can use TDs and not just science. Also, an undead is going to fluctuate in acres a lot due to trying to build up elites, so it'll be that much harder to go A/M than A/T.

[Hooah]

Yeah he multiplied to get the 100, but made a mistake to write a plus sign. The "lol" was laughing at the fact that he got the answer right with poor explanation.

ahhhh icee :)

[Ordray]

lol wow I missed the 3 posts before mine...

[Bishop]

stop going hybrid on undead!

rogues will be dropping too much opa - you need as much spec as possible to convert.
mystics cant keep wpa up with hits, which you need for converts.

Play undead as an attacker - they are far far better at it than hybrid.

[Ordray]

Play undead as an attacker - they are far far better at it than hybrid.

+1 .

[EdibleUndies]

Agreed ^^

I have been looking for a reason to tell my KD mates that want to go UD/mystic that it just isn't going to be that great, and there it is. Huge amount of attacks needed, acres constantly coming and going, no way to keep a high number of guilds sustained and manage high OPA, with low attack times.

Bishop...you wouldn't happen to be the same GhettoBishop that was monarch of a KD I was in about 3 years ago would you? LOL. I know it is an odd question and off topic...just curious. All halfling A/T age, 6/7 war wins ring a bell?