Originally Posted by
Ethan
Something still seems wrong there - the top line items (100% success) look right, at least for the first two (I don't know the third off the top of my head). But for the 50% with 0% random intel (halfer war scenario) we know it *ought* to occur when you have exactly 97% of target's defense. I assume this would be listed as 3% under, or maybe 3.093% "over" (as in target has 103.093% your sent MO). In neither description would it be 2.76, as I think your sheet listed.
Also, the .01% and 0% cases should get *lower* as the intel uncertainty increases - the better the intel, the less lucky you can be in intel. Normally not relevant, since most assume they will be unlucky, but the fact that your numbers don't follow that trend suggests something is a bit fishy still.
My formal probability is rusty, but I'll try to mash out the formal equation at some point soon. Intel variability range will be a parameter (good approach on that Bijo), not because I expect to have worse intel than 3%, but sometimes I have a tighter range due to taking multiple SoT... so intel error range will be unbound. Among other things I'd like it built into my custom SoT+SoM excel, so I can know what risks I'm taking exactly.