Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: Undead Tactician Science pump.

  1. #1
    Regular
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    88

    Undead Tactician Science pump.

    As an undead tactician, should i convert into 30 banks, 30 schools to pump science. or do i just keep an aggressive build to perform learn attacks.

  2. #2
    Post Fiend kit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    121
    I hope you won't mind if I add a related question. What is an optimal Books Per Acre for an undead (non-sage)? The one the undead should try to achieve.

  3. #3
    Forum Fanatic E_Boko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,655
    as much as possible. same as any other province.

    you shouldnt convert to pump science this late in the age. undead are financially fit to be able to learn science throughout the age except when in war. but you dont need more then 25% schools with 20-30% banks for a good pump as long as the BE is good enough.

    also while you make your own science just learn like a mad man. pick your targets semi wisely. you know elves and faeries have the sci you want. humans tend to have a lot as well.

  4. #4
    Veteran Nobody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    561
    I've seen some fairly impressive sci on undeads... and they aren't "pumping science" they are using an aggressive regular build and just learning people for science.
    I'm aspiring to conspire.
    01100110 01110101 01100011 01101011
    00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101

  5. #5
    Forum Fanatic E_Boko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,655
    /me agrees with nobody.

  6. #6
    Post Fiend kit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    121
    I will rephrase my question a bit then. At what BpA does science give more networth than it's worth? We all know the non-linear effects of the science, and undeads having -% sci efficiency, there should be a certain bpa, when sci is no longer worth the networth it gives.

  7. #7
    Game Support Bishop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    21,332
    i think someone worked out that it was a ridiculously high amount - like 1 million bpa.
    Support email: utopiasupport@utopia-game.com <- please use this and don't just PM me| Account Deleted/Inactive | Utopia Facebook Page | #tactics <-- click to join IRC|
    PM DavidC for test server access

  8. #8
    Forum Fanatic E_Boko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,655
    1 million books gives you 10.8K NW. if you had 1 mil books on just alchemy at 1000 acres that would have 35.4% more income. normal provinces would get 44.27% income. if thats worth it to you then you could get 1 million books in each category except food. almost 64.8K more NW but you would have 35% more income, 35% more gains (better then orc), 16.44% more peasants, 151.78% to thievery and magic, 25.29% more BE.

    lets say you had a 2tpa and 2 wpa. that would be boosted to 5 mod of each. if you tried to reach that without science that would be 3K more thiefs and 3K more wizards which at 4 NW a piece is already 24K NW.

    im not sure what the threshold is where science isnt worth having but its definetly so high up nobody can reach it anyway so get as much as you can.

    EDIT: in my example thats 6 mil books which is only a 6000 BPA. a million BPA is just ridiculous lol but like i said its so high no one can achieve it in an age.

  9. #9
    Game Support Bishop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    21,332
    1 million books per acre - thats not what you calced. It would be over 400% alc sci easily
    Support email: utopiasupport@utopia-game.com <- please use this and don't just PM me| Account Deleted/Inactive | Utopia Facebook Page | #tactics <-- click to join IRC|
    PM DavidC for test server access

  10. #10
    Post Fiend kit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    121
    Thanks a lot EJade. That answers my question completely.

  11. #11
    Post Demon
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,524
    I'd done old calcs and found these to be loose guidelines for a sage with 30% libs - non sage will also be somewhat close though a bit lower I think. Run for an old human A/T sage (back when human had the sci bonus, not the sage part.)
    All these values are the point at which the increased NW/A outweighs the extra military you can gain from rebalancing your other stats to the same value. Aka, the "max".

    Alchemy........ 2,500 bpa
    Tools ........... 2,500 bpa
    Housing......... 10,000 bpa
    Food ........... 100 bpa
    Military.......... unknown
    Crime............ 500 bpa
    Channeling..... 500 bpa

    Note how low food is, and how high housing is. Channeling saves spare as well as lowers the raw wpa needed, so it was (almost?) as good for an A/T as thievery itself. (I do think I only assume 10-12 mod tpa) I have no way to evaluate military science as a conversion into direct military strength - there is no building you can "save space in" from increased gains. (Compare farms, towers, or everything due to BE sci)

    Note the higher the military sci, the more NW the land "has" fixed - very high military sci totals will increase these values, especially the housing sci. I think I was assuming it was about 10% of the total, so 1500 to 2000 bpa.


    I point out, has 1,000,000 bpa been meant as a number (as opposed to a representative "really big number") your province would be over 10,000 nw/a from science alone, and would probably hit over 12,500 with all the other items. Whereas you'd have +1164% housing sci max (sage, 50% libs, 100% housing), so you've got less than 370 ppa to defend your 10,000+ nw/a. Assuming 100% defense with 150% DME somehow... we get to .22 DPNW - low, but ok of an aggressive attacker... but this prov has no offense, and we made some rounding up assumptions so it isn't even that good.

    In short - if you ever find yourself with 1 million bpa - save all sci points, and try to at least quadruple in size within the next day or two. (Probably when the land from your last hit arrives... unless you are dead by then.)
    it's vs. its is ambiguous - from now on I'm attempting to use the proper possessive it's, and the contraction 'tis. (Its will just be the plural.)

    Think Different

  12. #12
    Sir Postalot Lestat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Christchurch, New Zealand
    Posts
    3,137
    The science is waiting for you out there, just reach out and take it. Don't be a mug and learn it yourself.

  13. #13
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    390
    lol I would love having 1 mil bpa, that sounds so broken. who needs def, no one could attack you with NW based gains, youd explore ftw!

  14. #14
    Forum Fanatic E_Boko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,655
    science science science. i tell my ppl you can never have enough. only the special listen to me though lol

    im with lestats. 75% of my science is "learned". lol. poor faeries and elves.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    12
    Ethan - an A/T would be running TD's and getting the theivery bonus from that as well. Since guilds don't offer the same benefit you'd want a much more disproportionate ratio between thief sci and magic sci. I don't know exactly how much but if you have any TD's it'll definitely be significant.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •